Recent Posts
Something needs to be done about northeastern chri...
Yrz15o
No.533120
tfw even sanctioned out north korea managed to make a more functional tank than Pajeets, yea it might look like a gimmicky copy of the Abrams and use scavenged off Russian Chinese hardware but still, and now he ride it with his chubby (auto-excised) daughter hail the supreme leader
iqRJTe
No.533126
>>533120(OP)
You anti natnl scums should be exiled to north korea or china. Only then you will learn
Yrz15o
No.533129
>>533126
>go to a nation with a spine
I would like to, but now that I'm already born here I won't betray the land.
YzrSxJ
No.533131
>>533120(OP)
Hehe, cute.
G5RdGA
No.533142
>>533120(OP)
it's internal sabotage by import lobby and our army had trust issues with indigenous designers
see for example (INSAS problems)
G5RdGA
No.533146
>>533142
also INSAS production should have been given to private sector since our OFBs are not good
I hope govt encourages pvt sector arms manufacturing
35XwVf
No.533162
>>533120(OP)
I know about this company which makes high quality tactical headgear. They currently have more orders from Armenia than India
hJPNhE
No.533372
>>533120(OP)
Tanks are obsolete in 21st century
FG4LwL
No.533469
>>533465
tanks are pretty useless nowadays , u literally can take out a tank with a cheap drone (just see rus ukr war) , its the era of drones rn
QqLdUx
No.533473
>>533469
Yeah, it was about time, drones really changed how mera ranks were.
vtY6Ih
No.533507
TENl2s
No.533520
>>533507
I don't think so
DCHMp+
No.533525
>>533469
>he also doesn't know
It has always been a tug of war between armour and anti-armour weapons, retards who don't understand that tech and doctrine keeps evolving have been calling tanks obsolete from WW1 when they made their first debut itself. And so did they in the interwar era, and then when Germany showcased new doctrine they all suddenly started making tanks in the same philosophy...
Besides (auto-excised) the picrel I shared is a concept tank with a 30mm RCWS with airburst rounds, it can be hooked up to onboard optical trackers and also get input from external radars. And it is not experimental tech, literally every new MBT has such integrated... except the Pajeet FRCV because Pajeets are so primitive and slow in innovation that even their future mbts are built for the wars of the past, but well we haven't seen any actual prots so lets w8
>>533473
>>533503
>more retaards
Srsly you (auto-excised)s have been around since centuries, people who thought like you brought disaster to France and Britain early WW2 until they adapted and accepted mass armour formations. It is just the Russians who are retarded and slow in applying and adapted to new scenarios and doctrine.
y1b9pw
No.533530
DCHMp+
No.533532
>>533507
NO, tho it does have AARLs so it can carry more than in a conventional layout. Around 2 bunker busters like they dropped on Iran and 16 900kg JDAMs.
fFWkAm
No.533533
>>533120(OP)
North Korea has never been in any war
They are mostly hot air, like all Asian countries are
the true nature of Asians is one of pure submissiveness, bowing endlessly even more so after they get hit/humiliated and then taking out the resentment on those weaker than them (animals, children, elderlies)
L98EM/
No.533535
>>533120(OP)
They literally modified the t 62 with cardboard and metal sheets.
The driver position occupied by her fat (auto-excised) proves it only if the skirt of the tank are taken down exposing the wheel.
Also scum like you should be lynched for lobbying for some face saving bug people who are unironically commie filth
FIg4n1
No.533536
>>533525
Tanks are irrelevant though, a drone can just wipe out out, it's BROOTAL. Tank glazers will never be the same kek.
Di9f5g
No.533537
>>533530
chutiye post toh pdhle (auto-excised)ike, especially atgms are giong to have an ever harder time when every fmbt rolls around with an aps, get ready to see tank destroyers with casemates or some new indirect fire weapon being used in mass
Di9f5g
No.533540
>>533536
Yaar (auto-excised) you guys can't read the post again, Ig you retards are so clueless you don't understand the jargon
y1b9pw
No.533542
>>533507
Photo is slightly memetic. But here the numbers
configured like:
Up to 80 × 500 lb bombs (like Mk-82 / JDAM)
Up to 16 × 2,000 lb bombs (Mk-84 / GBU-31)
Up to 16 nuclear bombs (B61 or B83)
+1
2 × GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (30,000 lb class bunker busters)
Also supports cruise missiles like JASSM and JSOW
FIg4n1
No.533547
>>533540
Keep coping, whatever helps you LC's sleep ig
Di9f5g
No.533553
>>533535
No you're confusing Cheonma-ho with Cheonma-2, the new one came in 2020, is largely a clean sheet design, tho as i said uses similar internal layout and some scavenged parts
Di9f5g
No.533571
>>533553
Also even with the skirt you can see it has 7 wheels, the ho built over the t62 had 6
Di9f5g
No.533575
>>533488
pointy is better than curve yaar, curve hit the ground and ricochet, pointy is scary
FIg4n1
No.533579
Good god, this LC just won't stop chimping out and wordcelling about irrelevant thread, man, we really allow any LC on site nowdays
Di9f5g
No.533586
>>533579
>chutiya can't even understand the posts because he is utterly clueless about what is being discussed
They are relevant to the thread and the (auto-excised)giri you are engaging in
