Recent Posts
/Dawood ibrahim discussion thread/
8eRdDy
No.534541
>>534539(OP)
Gobars can&x27;t think beyond sex and make everything about sex Even bhakbhangis get it now
Gobars will fetishize Krishna but men will respect goddess as Their mothers Not confusing at all
(Text Content Sanitized Too.)
D2VNGc
No.534550
AN3T4S
No.534555
>>534550
Porn did severe damage to brain of these zoom zoom, jew psyop btw
8n6VB7
No.534556
>>534539(OP)
(Text Content Sanitized Too.)
bQ6njE
No.534562
>>534550
Back to plebbit chamaar, portraying krishna as some degenerate niggér is a gobarnd plebbit propaganda. It gives feminishits a high ground to promote randipana and at the same time show him in a bad light 'womanizer'
TzAxuI
No.534567
>>534562
Care to elaborate how is it degenerate? I am not familiar on the book
TzAxuI
No.534569
D2VNGc
No.534577
>>534562
>hurr durr sex bad plebbotor sex bad waaahh
ro lo unkill
sex is a biological process
>Portraying Krishna as degen
I just posted a random cover page of kama sutra
are you a retard?
D2VNGc
No.534582
>>534577
some publisher just used an image of radha Krishna statue as cover art
D2VNGc
No.534584
>>534569
iirc kama sutra doesn't permit it
between lovers is fine though adultery is not
especially for women
TzAxuI
No.534586
>>534584
I don't understand the complaining then. I feel like a lot of anons have internalised abrahamic value that inherently treats sexual relations, even if with your own marital partner as something a bit bad. This is wierd because in many abrahamic society, this led to putting foids on a pedestal where men will have sex with even a set of little boys, since it is technically not as bad as "defiling a woman". I am actually failing to read on what is exactly bad about the book, or what made him call lord Krishna a nigger exactly.
D2VNGc
No.534595
>>534586
Abrahmic values either makes you put women on a pedestal or makes them nothing more than baby making machines
both extremes are bad and dont see them as humans
foids must be treated as equals (some exceptions) in both good and bad
>what made him call lord Krishna a nigger exactly
his unclefied coombrain is so conflicted b/w his porn addiction and psyop'd brain that seeing kama sutra featuring RadhaKrishna (a sign of eternal love) made him chimp out
now I will proceed to post Radha Krishna paintings just to make this muzzie seethe
TzAxuI
No.534608
>>534595
I think it is more about the fact that since sex is instantly associated with pornography, I mean it is degenerated now since it is not as much of a private activity as it once was between people in a closed and limited social value, but more like a public show which is entry point into degeneracy.
I believe this is why concept of sex itself seems disgusting to them, as merging abrahamic value demonizes sexual activities of almost all forms. I noticed a lot of Jeets have madona whore ptsd syndrome too. Where they either respect a girl to the point they can't see her sexually, or they will mentally degrade her to a degree of whore in the order to be sexually attracted to her.
Mentally feeble people are more likely to get both, affected by this, as they demonize sex but also consume pornography at the same time, and compensate for their failings by attacking what has always existed. It could be a muzzie but it could also just be a hindu, or bhakt bhangi like OP presented. People have extremely poor understanding of their faith, thanks to majority of societal morals and norms circulating arround abrahamic faith.
I guess they fear we will hard rebound away from what is civil society, if we move away from it but I don't think Hinduism is exact polar opposite of abrahamic faiths. I think it's just somewhere in a more reasonable spot in middle that is far more functional. Same way many smriti has really hard punishment for cheating women, I guess a book that defines and describes sexual relations of two lovers, specially if married as only a means to balance that.
D2VNGc
No.534623
>>534608
a lot of Hinduism is the collective knowledge of different scholars (rishis)
which causes hinduism to be cnflicting sometimes when we consider later texts (like manusmriti)
The problem is we stopped adding more knowledge to our religion and started blind faith like those who follow abrahmics do
>Cuz point of abrahmic faith is literally mass manipulation
which is why mordern Hinduism either looks too ahead of it's time (Rishis and mathemeticians whose knowledge is applicable even now)
or looks straight up disgusting (whatever the fuck happens on Holi and Diwali nowadays)
Fz2W6f
No.534628
>>534586
Wait!! i thought the blue color was actually a representation of darker shade of skin colour, is he not a dark skinned indian?? Krishna??
I was thinking of creating a entire thread on this theory
that maybe ram was a bastard child and wanted to usurp the throne, and since he was dark skinned and remaining all others were light skinned and since he created a entire story around it. it was maybe ancient psyop to make him look good at that time public (u know a paid propaganda ) ???
Am i wrong ?? If this is wrong!!! my whole theory would be down the drain
Also I need a baman to clarify my doubts I asked chatgpt but he is just confirming my bias
to further refine it I need someone who is atleast knowledgeable
Also would like ur thoughts on this theory ?? Godd enough for a thread on /rta/
Theory so wild even captcha was :tf
D2VNGc
No.534636
>>534628
>is he not a dark skinned Indian?? Krishna??
he is that's what his name means (roughly) but most indians are dark skinned are you a retard??
>whatever the fuck you wrote after that
yes you are a retard
Fz2W6f
No.534640
>>534636
Ohh my bad!! is it it because of punctuation?? U can't understand that ?? Yea need to improve on that
wasn't ram always described as different than even sita ?? Even laxman was described as fair skin
since it was a continuation of aryan invasion theory i thought the rulers were actual pretty wheatish at that point of time some guy explained that in this very forum (i can't find it )
being a black son i thought he was actually a lc chamar trying to usurp the throne
the theory is wild but sound enough i wanted to have a serious discussion on that
AN3T4S
No.534645
>>534628
>Wait!! i thought the blue color was actually a representation of darker shade of skin colour, is he not a dark skinned indian?? Krishna??
He is. He is supposed to have a dark color that has a blue sheen. Certain hypermellanistic folks have this skin color that makes the light which bounces off them seem blue. Krishna is meant to be bluish black, while Vishnu is supposedly a literal vibrant hue of blue, like ocean under the sky.
>I was thinking of creating a entire thread on this theory
>that maybe ram was a bastard child and wanted to usurp the throne,
Not really, it won't make sense.
>and since he was dark skinned and remaining all others were light skinned and since he created a entire story around it.
Would not make sense either, since in terms of his appearance he has "syama" color that was a more so on tint of blue than actually dark skin close to black.
)it was maybe ancient psyop to make him look good at that time public (u know a paid propaganda ) ???
Not really, that won't make sense either. If he could afford it or wanted to do it then he could have avoided killing a priestly class that got him as well as his brother cursed for it. A propaganda that portrays you in bad light based on social norms of the said time won't exactly help you in solidifying your rule at the time. It also won't make sense to portray his brothers are decent people if it was done for throne rivalry.
A bastard child theory only works if a child is born outside the wedlock. That simply was not the case. Another issue is ayodhya kanda goes out of its way to solidify his appearance was the same as his father. Which makes a lot more sense since Brahmins in Gauda region, considered color that is too light to be that of cowards. Associating it with evil. Consider the picrel for instance.
>Am i wrong ?? If this is wrong!!! my whole theory would be down the drain
Well, yes, i mean take branches such as the Shukla Yajurveda clan. They got that name for the fact that light skin was inherently rarer in the subcontinent. Specially in the harsh climate where people live in.
>Also I need a baman to clarify my doubts I asked chatgpt but he is just confirming my bias
I feel like you people are too comfortable with not opening a book, and checking LLM that will give different answers in different days. LLM is good for complex calculation if you can give it concise data you provide to operate on. If you ask it to operate on data set it has prior, it is laced with both bias and lack of factual grounds.
>to further refine it I need someone who is atleast knowledgeable
Yaar
>Also would like ur thoughts on this theory ?? Godd enough for a thread on /rta/
I mean, majority of people will realise you have never read the books and will make fun of you. I wish you would actually confirm this first hand.
>Theory so wild even captcha was :tf
Kek, yaar DAYOOS do you see this shit. Ye hai apne desh ke footure, jinke liye mai stoody maxxing karta hu. Over hai yaad.
AN3T4S
No.534649
>>534640
>aryan invasion theory
Didn't recent papers confirm that based on most variety of R1 haplo it infact originated near the subcon? Pretty sure their was explanation that whoever made it to Europe basically wiped out entire male populace and preserved their R1a haplo, but got rid of gene marker.
(For instance say a Nigerian man who slept with white person, will have a son with A1 haplo but have 50% CGH and 50% Sub Saharans Gene, but as that son has a child with another white girl, he will be 75% CGH and 25% Sub Saharan gene, as this goes on for 10 generation, entire Sub Saharan gene will be gone but A1 haplo of the sub Saharan origin will remain still)
AN3T4S
No.534650
>>534636
>>534637
Sometimes I wonder does that jobless neet anon not have a job because he does stuff like this, or he does stuff like this because he is a jobless neet who has not had a job for over a year. But then i realise concluding it won't make any kind of difference, since he will continue to stay a jobless man.
L1jRX8
No.534659
>>534539(OP)
Yaar Handu ye kya Randpana hai Religion ke naam par
AN3T4S
No.534661
>>534653
Btw half of it is same fag, which is pretty sad, you couldn't pay me enough to do this shit.
Fz2W6f
No.534664
>>534645
>>534649
Yea I think ur right. I was basing this on the superficial knowledge.thats why I needed help to clarify this.
Well if that is wrong i have few questions regarding ramayana it would be good if u can help me ??
What was the time period of the initial drafts or ramayana being spread ?
What was the geopolitical situation of that time (focus on southern india) ?
Where there any rise of Buddhism during the time frame of when ramayana being spread ??
Who was the king or school of thought who helped spread the ramayana in Indian subcontinent??
I know it's more on history rather than dharma it would help if u can help me ??
D2VNGc
No.534669
AN3T4S
No.534674
>>534669
I can answer all of those, but why should I : D
Fz2W6f
No.534675
>>534650
I'm a student not a job maxxer yet
Fz2W6f
No.534681
>>534669
>>534674
Because I was thinking that it was still a psychological tool using it to justify the colonial usurpement of local dieties in the broader hinduverse and taking them as a form of Trinity rather than a unique god
Just feel what it does in ur subconscious
>The souths are weird creature having animalistics feature
>The army that helped the ram to victory is nothing more than apes (and apes are inferior)
>The spiritual north will be the one to liberate the advance scientific south
>Even when the south was ruled by a shivite and he still lost
> cementing the viashnavites supremacy
See how it subconsciously makes it look like the south cannot self govern and should always be in vassalisation of the north despite having better scientific temper such as flying vehicle and the bridge engineering.
The beauty of hinduism is exactly that. while the abhrahamic religions always wanted to colonise the lands. the Hindus try to colonise the divines making them part of their own cosmology resulting in such diverse and conflicting thoughts
Also the bastard child theory may be wrong but he was a second born right so maybe he wanted to have the throne for himself and i don't think u understand how propaganda works if it was all good. people may ask questions and can see conflicting things but if he lampshades it by killing a baman, people will not look elsewhere and focus on that only.
Final also but u can call me brainwashed or whatever but I truly believe our ancestors were truly that smart and the story is real but it was greatly exaggerated or misaligned.
