Recent Posts
what youtubers does bhach watch
Another evidence nlggers are built different.
It's gobar
STOP WASTING MY TIME BHENCHOOOOOOD
Shame for Lundian media
Kalej main LPG ki kami ka ehsaas hone laga hain ya...
Old unkils, why did this happen?
Great decision
brootal
PSA: Update on spams on 11th March
What's their issue ?
What does /b/ think of John Kiriakou?
BGTOW GENERAL #3
so many anons banned
Leftist euphemisms
@sarvam
Why is wikipedia so shamelessly anti india, anti b...
Huh
1st sem ka result aa gaya yaaron
SGTOW General #55
Mods ki Jai ho
Hindi song
Cursed decade
Rate voice on scale of 1-10.
Iran allows Indian tankers to pass through Hormuz
Great decision
u7GPCR
No.520734
Love him or hate him, but the present CJI is 10x better than Chandrachuddha and Gavai.
>Tell us one good reason that we should issue a direction. After all, there are millions and millions of poor people, who take free blood facilities. They cannot afford private hospitals. It is the poor strata of the people who are sustaining on this blood. Why this poor people should be...even if there is a one percent chance of any infection, why they should be affected?"
If we had a more liberal leaning one like the previous CJIs, the decison would've been wildly different.
F/mUZn
No.520736
>>520734(OP)
Agreed
u7GPCR
No.520744
>>520734(OP)
What an absolutely retarded take by the petitioners.
>many countries, including the United States, United Kingdom and Canada have changed their rules to allow gay men to donate blood. The ban is based on outdated and biased views from the 1980s, following which medical technology has greatly improved, especially in blood screening, the petitioners state
Blaady this is not first world nation. Even saaf paani is a luxury here. Nearly 100% of donated blood is screened in those western nations. This isn't happening in a country riddled with corrupt babuns. Even if one bad lot of blood goes without screening, dozens of gawreebs will die from aids.
F/mUZn
No.520752
>>520744
Their is a theory that homosexuality passes via actually infection in some cases. I respect the autonomy of us not wanting blood of homosexual in us.
3heBDK
No.520754
F/mUZn
No.520756
>>520754
The blood won't just reach dehati, it would reach everyone Pajeet, you can have the faggot blood, not me or my girlfriend.
oQh7zQ
No.520758
>>520754
u7GPCR
No.520790
>>520752
That just seems like a hoax yaar. But the blood from these individuals is still high risk especially in third world nations riddled with babudom.
u7GPCR
No.520791
>>520754
retard
F/mUZn
No.520793
>>520790
Precisely. Even if we remove the "yuck, filthy and gross homosexual" (which they all, all queer shall be killed one day) they shouldn't get to donate their blood because they pose actually risk of aids and std. We definitely can't afford that shit in this hellhole.
p3peAZ
No.520795
sudm5T
No.520800
Saars
(Text Content Sanitized Too.)
F/mUZn
No.520811
>>520795
This is not USA anon.
























































