Recent Posts
2FF31a
No.475783
>please care about my religion saar
Why are religious people like this?
vzLT5/
No.476004
>>475999
Bhach is an actual mirror on real india
s02Awk
No.476019
>>476004
True
+RPL2Y
No.476037
>>476004
if you can clean the mirror
guess you can also clean some of the real thing
"we the nation" afterall i guess
ZwYwH0
No.476044
>>475783(OP)
>Muslim Atheist
>Christian Atheist
Oxymorons
>Hindu Atheist
Also Oxymoron but at least not as bad. You can be a "Hindu Agnostic" but not a "Hindu Atheist".
And no, Savarkar was not an 'atheist' in case anyone brings it up. He's more agnostic/pantheist larper.
+RPL2Y
No.476049
>>476044
true Hinduism is more of a philosophy
consisting of philosophies of many sages over the years
svg1rR
No.476115
>>476044
How are they oxymorons? If someone doesn't feel like following their religion, then they're atheist. Don't make shit up, pajeet.
7Gk2Sy
No.476128
Tsji3Q
No.476130
>>476049
No, it's not. Nastiks are not Hindus. There's Hindu philosophy just like how there's 'Muslim philosophy' but itself mostly entrenched in theology and morality.
>>476115
If they don't feel like it, then they're just "atheists", simple as. Stop calling yourself labels like 'Hindu atheist' or 'Muslim atheist' chamar.
And no, having a hate hierarchy where Hindus below muzzies won't make you 'Hindu'. If you don't care about the preservation of the core tenets of that religion, then stop calling yourself belonging to that religion.
svg1rR
No.476139
>>476130
Pajeet, it's better if someone says muslim atheist instead of just I'm atheist saar. People have this fixed idea that atheist means only ex-Handoo, and Muslims are always conservative, they would never leave Islam. That's why saying Muslim atheist is necessary, otherwise the misconception stays strong and everyone assumes Muslims can't be non-believers.
Tsji3Q
No.476141
I'll ask the self identifying 'X atheist' a simple question? What makes you the X? Simply bring born as X? So if you convert to some other religion Y, will that make you a X Y?
Do a ricebag convert be called a 'Hindu Christian'?
>>476130
>>476115
I'll also add that while most Hindu philosophies allows doubt, they don't explicitly deny the divine. Which is why I said you can be a Hindu agnostic but not a Hindu atheist.
Tsji3Q
No.476150
>>476139
Abdul, I know you're inbred and might suffer from low IQ due to IBD related diseases but your argument is basically 'umm people think I'm handoo because I've seen only handoos leave their religion' which is you just projecting your stupidity on to others. People assume that because this is a Hindu majority country.
s02Awk
No.476155
>>476128
They abuse Hindu gods daily, burn ur scriptures, have their own prophets.
svg1rR
No.476165
>>476150
Kitna ad hominem karega, pajeet? My original argument was obv as per India. Did you seriously think I was talking about le pajeet atheism in timmyland? There's no such thing as agnosticism in India. It's either religious people or atheists here. If you're agnostic, then you're a crypto handoo/muthlim.
gSiGdi
No.476191
>>475783(OP)
Better than being a cum guzzling faggot like you subhumans are
Kl/aft
No.476250
>>476155
Have their own prophets in the sense commies have karl marx and lenin and have das kapital as their bible but it is still not a religion. Its a political ideology.
j8OyZt
No.476258
>>476165
>My original argument was obv as per India
And your original argument was retarded as fuck, retarded Abdul.
Just tell you're ex muzzie or something.
>It's either religious people or atheists here
Sure, we can have it that way.
>you're a crypto handoo/muthlim
There's not much 'crypto hindu/Muslim' phenomenon in India. You feel the need to be cryptic about your beliefs because you feel your ideas will be rejected by wider society. What we have instead are crypto atheists larping as muzzie/heendu to spread their globohomofaggot agenda worship.
xgmmMK
No.476390
>>476250
I'm talking about Ambedkar, it is illegal to criticize him. You are guilty proven innocent.
BoxUID
No.476394
Atheism is recognized only in hindu religion. This alone speaks Volumes
J9CnkR
No.476654
>>476394
Not really. It's a misconception spread by midwits with superficial understanding of scriptures, usually by misinterpreting the Nasadiya Sukta. This is like using some random cherry picking pic related line from Ecclesiastes to claim that Christian/Jewish Atheism is a valid tradition.
Kl/aft
No.476956
>>476390
That still doesnt make it a religion. Political ideology is not religion. There hv to be supernatural elements in belief system for it to be a religion.
5iEI7M
No.477329
>>476390
Its not illegal to criticise him. Wtf are you talking about
lx1bDE
No.477352
>>475999
Subbo got btfo'd kek
lx1bDE
No.477355
>>476004
With 8 users? Yaar literally you subbos say shit that makes us wonder why we even have you negroids human rights.
lx1bDE
No.477358
>>476390
True, you can try to criticise him in maharstra and you will be lynched. My ex was genuinely afraid of bringing up periyar betifucker and child rapist in Kerala back when we were dating. It's not like it's entire jeetland, but a majority of state where subbo are saturated are both shithole as well as retarded. Muh chumvidhan lmao.
lx1bDE
No.477361
>>476654
If he means charvakyan tradition, then that is still part of sanatan but it's not Hinduism. However Hinduism does acknowledge athiest and thinks it is ok to be it. We don't really have "saar believe in my faith or brim and grim and flame!" Like the lowborn mujjie and christkikes do.
lx1bDE
No.477365
>>476141
It partially comes down to people still holding a degree of revenance and loyalty to sects they all came from. The reason "X athiest" is asked is to gauge the loyalty and alignment of a person. A muslim athiest will always end up supporting islam amd pakistani, when we won't, a Hindu one would be jai bhim faggot, a christkikes will be a timmy glazing lowborn troon. It's conditional baggage unless your family as been athiest for over 10 generations, which no one has in this nation.
