Recent Posts
Based
The Personality Assesment System, associated with the CIA
zmKY1/
No.148420
It's an interesting model that I think a lot of you migh find interesting. The CIA apparently used it, when vetting candidates. It doesn't hold back; If you're an autist it'll call you an autist, if you're a sociopath, it'll call you one. Like how the MBTI (mbti is complete bullshit btw) uses four axes, this one uses three:
1)The Intellectual dimension (Externalizer-Internalizer): This one basically represents how "outward-facing" one is. An externalizer is focused on the outside, the environment, whereas an internaliser is preoccupied with ideas and abstraction.
2)The Mechanical-Procedural dimension (Regulated-Flexible): Those who are "regulated" learn by rote and are focused on the part, not the whole. "Flexible" individuals focus on the whole picture, leaving out the detail for the big picture.
3)The Social dimension(Acceptable, Unacceptable): Basically how adaptable you are in social situations.
So, you basically get 8 primary alignments. Additionally, each factor can be "compensated" or not. So you get 64 basic aligments. You can take the test for yourself at: https://www.pasf.org/pasq/
It'll ask you for some personal details, just write some fake bullshit.
Here's an explanation in more detail: https://www.pasf.org/model1.php
zmKY1/
No.148449
>>148420(OP)
Do the test nigggas
zmKY1/
No.148450
>>148449
You don't need to sign in or pay or anything.
oL44l0
No.148452
>>148449
No
D6B9/U
No.148584
I took this test. I got IFU.
The traits fit who I am as a person.
uEd6Gb
No.148588
>>148584
Same here. And the basic test?
/B3QNn
No.148591
>>148420(OP)
Reality is inward oriented but bhacels believe lies of world.
D6B9/U
No.148618
8wbChv
No.148630
>>148618
I’ll explain soon. But it’s there on the website, just check. Is it accurate?
8wbChv
No.148633
D6B9/U
No.148637
>>148630
>>148633
>In general, the e*fu tends to be a self-sufficient person who has well defined intellectual or mechanical-procedural interest and who is insulated from social-interpersonal distractions. He has considerable self-discipline, largely directed against any tendency to be environmentally withdrawn or autistic. He has a strong need to develop his mind and body and is often oversensitive to subtle changes in his physiological functioning or his ability to concentrate. He has little patience with things he does not accept nor understand, but is more inclined to ignore such activities than to try and change or adapt to them. He seeks out and remains with groups with similar interests and attitudes and can rarely, if ever, be enticed to leave a situation in which he feels comfortable and productive. He does not necessarily follow the cultural pattern from which he emerged, but will move toward those ideas and beliefs he accepts. He is very resistant to authority when he is thwarted or denied his individual activities, but is accepting of, and loyal to, authority figures with whom he can identify or whom he accepts. He lays great store on rationality, objectivity, and perseverance as human virtues. His major psychological problems include somatic preoccupation (often to the point of hypochondriasis or neurasthenia), self-discouragement with resultant guilt-based depression, and transitory, or not well maintained, paranoid states.
Yes. It's accurate.
I4c9uu
No.148680
>>148420(OP)
Don't click on the link pyaaro, blaaady IP gropper
JjEPGY
No.148682
>>148680
Thanks anamas.
ZdsxiN
No.148686
>>148584
Same here
NoNrNA
No.148688
>>148680
It’s not retard. The site has been there like since the 90s.
JyKvej
No.148690
>>148686
Interesting. Which subtype?
Q3QUHF
No.148702
zmKY1/
No.149055
>>148618
So, basically a persons primitive type, say IFU for example, is what they are born with. Compensation occurs in adolescence or childhood. Basically it is a mechanism to go against the inherent traits, due to say social phenomenon or other environmental factors. For example, a primitive I might be compensated and incorporate externalizer traits is then considered Ic. Hence, the primitive IFU can yield 8 basic configurations (each trait can be compensated or uncompensated). Hence, there are 64 in total.
frtF/4
No.149125
>>149055
Okay, so it's a nature vs. nurture kind of thing. Compensated is a learned thing and uncompensated means it's still immature.
zmKY1/
No.149335
>>149125
>uncompensated means it's still immature
Not really. It just means that it has been changed, due to whatever environmental situation. It isn't really "mature" as such. Infact extremely highly compensated individuals can tend to be sadistic and violent, because they are repressed. For example, here's the highest compensated IFU type:
tkLFVB
No.149398
>>148420(OP)
whats the difference between this and OCEAN
zmKY1/
No.149451
>>149398
Big difference. Ocean has 5 axes, PAS has 3. Also, the defining feature is the concept of "compensation". I think you'll find this stuff interesting, give it a read, pseud.
tkLFVB
No.149453
>>149398
I got IFA(High activity), profile desc is accurate enough for me to agree there to be some merit to this, but from birth? I seriously doubt that.
zmKY1/
No.149456
>>149453
>from birth
Not from birth, I guess bad wording on my part. I think "inherent" fit's the bill.
zmKY1/
No.149457
>>149456
fits
tkLFVB
No.149468
This being an image board I suspect most anons will score similarly (Ixx or IxU)
zmKY1/
No.149473
>>149453
Did you do the basic factors test? Which one did you get?
Hi71v+
No.149476
>>149468
This test is garbage.
zmKY1/
No.149478
>>149476
What did you get kek?
zmKY1/
No.149479
>>149476
In my opinion, the second part of the test (The basic one) isn't very accurate. The IFU one fits me to a T though.
tkLFVB
No.149552
>>149473
IcFcAc (actually IcFcAo)
!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a
UY9nWN
No.149564
I'd rather click to find out what kind of pokedragon I am than take another personality test.
Personality tests are so stupid, circumstantial, limiting, annoying and tiring. People believe in them like cultists.
Hi71v+
No.149567
Hi71v+
No.149568
IFU*
zmKY1/
No.149572
zmKY1/
No.149575
>>149567
Sampling bias. Imageboards attract IFUs.
zmKY1/
No.149582
>>149564
Do it, I feel you'll like it. I agree, that a lot of people take personality tests to an extreme and make it look off-putting. But everything has it's application. Also, it doesn't really matter.
Hi71v+
No.149584
>>149575
This test is itself retarded.
>if you feel nervous at large gathering you a IFU
>if you feel you are le edgin master mind manipulator of situation you might be something else
>no no other option
Guess where most normal people would lie
Hi71v+
No.149588
That makes me think. A fully trained AI about psychiatry can totally replace psychiatrist. Their job is literally joining the dots and AI can do this 100 faster with higher accuracy. Kek
zmKY1/
No.149599
>>149588
Difference between psychiatrist, and psychologist. But your point still holds good kek.
>>149584
You're projecting yourself onto others. The test has seen a lot of practical applications, however the questionare isn't the "real" test as such, just a close approximation. The real test is modelled based of WAIS subtests. Pretty interesting read:
tkLFVB
No.149601
>>149564
you fall into the same pattern as the cultists; there is certainly some usefullness to the conception that people can be assigned types and logically the greater the types the more precise it can in its diagnoses. And really, some people do genuinely respond to some archetypes(of course, archetypes are derived from people). So it has some usefulness if you understand the archetypes and what is to be expected by them. The thing is, essentially mathematising the complexity of a person to a handful of archetypes may lend you breadth in predicting only the baseline behaviours of a person, (if even that). Its not a 'catch-all' scripture as the cultists argue and not complete horseshit like you say.
zmKY1/
No.149606
>>149552
Interesting, this could explain why you namefag. You're essentially carving your initials here.
!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a
UY9nWN
No.149607
>>149601
I used to mindfuck MBTI cultists back in the day some 10 years ago on FB groups.
It's easy to bait them and make them argue on stupid shit like "No, you're not F, hue hue is an T thing!" Or "No, he is so E becatof huehue" and so on.
Cult of 16 boxes.
zmKY1/
No.149611
>>149607
MBTI is bullshit, everyone here agrees.
zmKY1/
No.149613
Saying that personality tests as a whole are retarded BECAUSE MBTI is retarded is really fucking stupid.
Hi71v+
No.149614
>>149599
The problem with test its just gives a 2 dimensional options. This or that which is retarded when talking about psychology. There was not an appropriate option for me in 95% questions.
tkLFVB
No.149619
>>149607
kekda, while its embarrasing to admit I used to be interested in this sort of stuff but its incredibly shitty typology and very delicate, essentially it holds you to be completely accurate with how what you think you are relates to what you actually are, and people oftentimes answer according to a type they hold in their mind that they like/would like to be.
zmKY1/
No.149621
>>149619
Everyone has phases which they cringe at now.
zmKY1/
No.149622
>>149606
What do you think about this?
tkLFVB
No.149624
>>149619
the less this stuff makes itself aware to you, the less you are aware of it and the more 'precise' it becomes, better tests have strange/indirect questions
tkLFVB
No.149627
>>149622
I need to read more about this and how it works though it might just be confirmation bias from your end. My name(fag) is just a clever wordplay nothing much.
zmKY1/
No.149638
>>149627
How accurate would you say the IcFcAc archetype describes you? For me, I'd say the IFU description is spot on, but the IcFcUc and IuFcUc mix (IoFcUc) isn't all that accurate.
tkLFVB
No.149663
>>149638
not very, IFA desc is more on spot, though usually reading type-assignments I'm more used to being fellated for being 'perfect' and 'unique' as it usually is with pop-psychiatry, this is far more sober(?) and specific which I appreciate.
zmKY1/
No.149673
>>149663
Kek, yeah. This doesn't hold back or hold your hand. I can't imagine an MBTI normie foid retard would react to this shit kek.
zmKY1/
No.149674
>>149673
how an
sq7m4R
No.149893
Bump.
Captcha:ER
q4G58p
No.150137
>>149673
It’s brootal.
oPIiht
No.150262
Found something interesting:
>Now to the Cultural implications. In OUR, CIA experience, we find that there are "cultural pools" of characteristics to be found in many nationalities. For example, Many Asians tend to be IRU's which is especially true of Chinese. They tend to be independent but oriented towards social protocols, focused, literal, non-empathic, or socially adept. Variations of the IR personality are found in the Japanese which tend to compensate on the social dimension which makes them more socially attentive and pleasant but none the less, they are called" inscrutable." Also found in this IRU cluster are the British and the Scandinavians which are prone to hold in and not express emotions, but are committed to focused productivity, with the British given to social protocols associated with class and Scandinavians more oriented toward individualism/egalitarianism, a la. Martin Luther roots.
Remaining in the Asian cluster we have Indians which tend to be IFU's, internalized, less focused organizationally, mystical and socially, self-absorbed. Yet, again the society is governed by the cast system which largely dictates much of social behavior and operational style.
Other Asian cultures Indonesia, Thailand, Cambodia, Malaysia, Filipinos are more IFU/A. The point being that these folks by large are more laid back, less competitive, more given to a pleasant face and yet still very self-absorbed. Of note, over the years, which individuals in these cultures became the economic drivers of these societies? Yes, the overseas Chinese which over the years migrated and integrated into them. The distinction is the R qualities, the" focused" and single-mindedness of the IRU Chinese. For their part, Vietnamese are more like the IRU Chinese than their IFU/A East Asian neighbors.
Arabs generally are IFU in orientation as are many African cultures. For the Arabs, it is the highly legalistic and structures nature of Islam, with its "R" demands that give Arabs more form and focus than what they are predisposed to be. Of note, in African cultures, the "F" qualities, namely the limited focus and organizational tendencies suggest reasons why they have not developed over the centuries like the Chinese. In African tribal history, It's more like each generation had to rediscover the same things previous generations discovered.
Then there is the Mediterranean personality, EFA, which is largely externally oriented, expressive, generally loosely organized, socially adept!
A variation of this theme is the Russian/Slavic personality which is ERU (also characteristic of Germans) They are externally oriented, focused, task oriented, and generally socially limited and because of the Soviet (or Nazi) culture, paranoid.
What about American culture-historically we were an ERA society. Externally oriented, focused, governed by religious values and recognition of the common good, competitive, productive and socially adept or accommodating. Although this is a generalization and as a society we are now a mosaic of the world's cultures, as a nation we have become increasingly EFU with decreased "compensations" of this pattern. Consequently, we are emotionally sensitive, even explosive because of the emphasis on individualism, "rights", etc, feelings and "human issues"have been idealized as opposed to discipline, productivity, accountability, and being able to handle details, boredom, deferred gratification. Socially we try to be adept, but we are so driven by feelings and emotions that civility is negated by demands for personal recognition and self-expression. Most forms of moral imperatives have been tossed overboard, consequently the model personality now is being a free-spirit, individualistic, and self-promoting. What we have become will only be exaggerated as personal standards of right and wrong become the nor
oPIiht
No.150272
>>150262
Not sure when this was written; the date isn’t mentioned. Interested in what you guys think about India being an IFU society.
oPIiht
No.150276
>>150274
Translate? Southie here.
gfVthK
No.150326
>>150320
How does it feel the be the same type as mr lulli Kek. Does it fit? Do the basic test.
8bpuUL
No.150328
>>150326
Share link
5gHWt7
No.150329
>>150328
Same as the original one, just click basic factors and put IRU.
8bpuUL
No.150338
tkLFVB
No.150360
zxzVxF
No.150392
>>148420(OP)
What should I do with this information now?
zmKY1/
No.150624
>>150392
Click the ifa link, and click the description of your entire profile link.
zmKY1/
No.150626
>>150338
Click the fucking link
zmKY1/
No.150631
zmKY1/
No.150633
tkLFVB
No.150642
>>150392
hila le thoda
tkLFVB
No.150688
>>150671
yaar its not fair, I get btfoed just after posting that.
zmKY1/
No.151033
>>150262
Somewhat similar to how Oswald Spengler, analysed cultures; They can be treated like human entities, with their respective birth, growth, maturity, decline and death. Analysing their "personalities" isn't a far stretch.
tkLFVB
No.151401
bumperino
dYytzz
No.151424
>>151401
Bumpesh
zmKY1/
No.151461
>>151401
Someone say something.
xEXBKK
No.151520
Cross posting this here: I have a theory as to why namefagging is so prevalent on inch; afaik even previous iterations had a bunch of notable namefags. The reason is that imageboards attract the counterculture, and the West being an individualistic society, results in western imageboards having a collectivistic mass of users who blend together. Whereas, ours is a collectivistic society, and hence accounts for the individualistic nature of bhach.
Digressing a bit, an indicator of the fact that we are a counterculture is that a lot of us show high degrees of compensation in the PAS.
ns6wk3
No.151522
>>148420(OP)
iru* (IuRuAc)
This is a relatively uncommon pattern because so many people with this adjustment are untestable. In the extreme, it is a classic, catatonic schizophrenic adjustment. The iru is an immature primitive IRA who has reacted against his surface social adjustment. He is negativistic, resistant to, and an defiant of; attempts to relate to him. This negativism usually takes the form of personal isolation and autistic withdrawal. In most cases, the iru will have shown signs of childhood schizophrenia, and will have been considered abnormal for some time. Severe temper tantrums, followed by withdrawal, are characteristics of extreme forms of this adjustment. Hallucinations rarely occur in this pattern, but frustration and thwarting often lead to combative and assaultive reactions.
xEXBKK
No.151524
>>151522
What % of it do you think is accurate?
rElnuV
No.151678
ok op i took the test, but this may be inaccurate because i think i was an IFA last time i took the test, it has given me EFA now. my mouse double clicked on a few questions and i didnt bother to go back and correct it bcoz half the questions are repeat ones
zmKY1/
No.151690
>>151678
>repeat ones
They're worded in different ways, the contradictions of your response to one wording and a different wording are a part of the test. Can't explain. Anyways, click the EFA link and tell if it fits.
rElnuV
No.151695
>>151690
i closed the tab
zmKY1/
No.151698
rElnuV
No.151712
zmKY1/
No.151714
>>151712
Kek, PAS is the only personality test, that'll brutally attack you. MBTI and whatever bullshit tests you foids talk about will call you a special snowflake.
zmKY1/
No.151717
>>151712
Do the basic factors test, put EFA and do it.
tkLFVB
No.151869
>>151678
>EFA not IFA
fuck me, dodged a bullet there, imagine if I was the same type as a jeeta larper
A6iLla
No.151871
>>148420(OP)
kya randi thread hai
A6iLla
No.151872
>>148420(OP)
iss betichod thread ko baar baar bump karna band karo yaar
A6iLla
No.151873
>>148420(OP)
faaltu ki bakwaas kar rahe ho poore thrad mein
A6iLla
No.151875
>>148420(OP)
waise Bhach ka bump threshold kya hai ?
A6iLla
No.151876
>>151874
bakwaas hai
A6iLla
No.151877
ab bump mat karna isse
A6iLla
No.151878
ok ?
A6iLla
No.151900
>>151898
bade harami ho beta
zmKY1/
No.151966
>>151877
I'm bumping this thread. Problem?
zmKY1/
No.151976
>>151869
>IFU not IRU
I'd rather be closer to a jeeta larper than tamil lund. You dodged a bullet, I dodged a whole ass missile.
zmKY1/
No.151985
>>151873
I doubt you can even understand what I'm talking about.
zmKY1/
No.152279
>>151875
Testing bump limit.
zmKY1/
No.152288
>>151520
Someone talk about this.
tkLFVB
No.152311
zmKY1/
No.152318
zmKY1/
No.152797
>>151877
bump
zmKY1/
No.153458
>>152797
zmKY1/
No.153459
Damn, what's the bump limit? Did dyaush remove it?
