Recent Posts
How to make it a reality?
eMHDSZ
No.554976
Kek yaar, i wish pajeet leftists had at least 1% of intellect of muttmerican ones
J5JwZ/
No.554986
>>554976(OP)
You wish pajeet media had as much as freedom. And pajeets in general
y809gq
No.554994
>>554986
Pajeet media are owned directly or indirectly by one of the major parties or people affiliated with them
U515SV
No.554997
>>554994
so is mutt media you dimwit, This is pretty much what chomsky said ages ago
vVcWs5
No.555006
Trump and the things he does is pretty much the reason why most of the western media even exists at this point.
>>554997
Epstein Island regular.
y809gq
No.555041
>>554997
Being ideologically affiliated isn't the same as being owned by them, retard.
>chomsky
Back to reddit, pol pot defending pedo.
y809gq
No.555113
>>555048
>semanticsmaxxing
>Confusing ownership with ideology
How reddit can you get retard?
>handoo thinks I like cucksky
Why namedrop him retard
U515SV
No.555355
>>555113
>Why namedrop him retard
because he was right about this, actually sub 85 iq
>>Confusing ownership with ideology
the effect is the same, this is what cucksky was talking about, you might be even lower than sub 85iq
XfsHAj
No.555369
https://www.instagram.com/cartoonistsatish Share your favourites.
XfsHAj
No.555370
DiXzdA
No.555371
>>555370
topkek
YUbf+s
No.555378
>>555372
Kek
y809gq
No.555380
>>555355
Chomsky
>Cite someone to back up your argument
>Get mad when someone assumes you're his supporter
Kys
Media
>The effect is same
Only midwit reddiors who are too fucking pretentious to understand their own biases think media can and should pretend to be objective and bias free.
In a democracy, an ideological media that pushes an agenda is better than a faux neutral network that's meant to push a politican or party who value personal power for himself over ideology that people who vote for support.
U515SV
No.555384
>>555380
>Only midwit reddiors who are too fucking pretentious to understand their own biases think media can and should pretend to be objective and bias free.
In a democracy, an ideological media that pushes an agenda is better than a faux neutral network that's meant to push a politican or party who value personal power for himself over ideology that people who vote for support.
these are completely unrelated to what I said. Actual schizoposting
y809gq
No.555392
>>555384
>Those two are same thing saar
>Actually completely unrelated
Make up your mind plebbitor, which is it?
bE4++r
No.555393
Chup chamatte
U515SV
No.555396
>>555384
Its quite clear you're really stupid if you can't fathom that one can agree on a few ideas from someone who one disagrees with overall, and doesn't particularly like. Foucault was a Paedophile, this much is clear, but to disregard his ideas simply on this basis is terribly low iq.
U515SV
No.555397
>>555392
whether a news network is owned by someone associated with the party, or by the party itself and if a news network is owned by someone who ideologically aligns with the party, the effect is the same, the rest is your schizobabble because you don't understand basic english
U515SV
No.555400
>>555397
also
>handoo thinks democracy is a good thing
brvtal sub 75 take, hara kiri now and you will still have some honour
y809gq
No.555405
>>555400
non sequitur you fucking smoothbrain
y809gq
No.555407
>>555397
Your empty retoric is based on no actual logic. You lack any actual pratical example to even understand how fucking stupid you are.
>Assam's biggest news channel, News Live went from pro-INC to pro-BJP when the owner's husband, Himanta changed side.
>NDTV's entire shift from being the darlings of rh left after Adani took over
This is not the fucking same as Rupert Murdoch supporting Trump out of ideological alignment when he has multiple times challenging him like with Ron de Santis.
