Recent Posts
Prove to me that EWS reservation is justified ?
dukAx3
No.526615
Hardmode: don't talk about SC/ST reservation
eazgmE
No.526617
>>526615(OP)
OBC creamy layer should be removed
pR6ju0
No.526623
>>526615(OP)
>>526617
It is not, no reservation is justified lmao
bhangis come up with all sorts of BS to justify.
Poorfag GCs were cracking exams without rejerbhation for decades without any help for gibermint.
If chamars and bhangis have problem with EWS rejerbhation then they should ask their baap (gibermint)
LB3A8d
No.526624
uOUjls
No.526626
>>526615(OP)
No reservation is justified
uOUjls
No.526628
>>526624
How many do you see demand more GC reservation?
RQPdel
No.526630
>>526615(OP)
It is not, if someone was aware and "rich" enough to sit in the exam and study for it then giving them reservations makes no sense, and if they were poor enough to not have been able to study then giving them reservations will degrade whatever institution it is being applied on. These are purely votebank assurement measures which swing elections in a turd world poorfag republik like Lundia. If they actually cared about the poor they'd focus on effective universal education so expensive coachings would not be needed.
LB3A8d
No.526632
>>526628
There's nothing that GCs can excuse for reservation, kuch ho to na chimp out karenge
LB3A8d
No.526634
>>526628
>No reservation is justified
The same group chimps on others and when pointed out they say the above
pR6ju0
No.526638
>>526624
>justify rejerbhation
>GC says no rejerbhation is justified
>GC never asked for rejerbhation
>why are you whining saar
yaar 60IQ chamar, i unironically support rejerbhation, gibermint should explicitly declare cuz chamars are extremely low IQ they cannot study without it.
rejerbhation exists in lundia cuz chamars and bhangis want it, and no it has nothing to do woth muh (indian) discrimination or whatever, SCs and so called OBCs do (indian) discrimination among themselves, rejerbhation has zero affect on it.
rejerbhation is just another political revdi, lundian politics runs on that shit
uOUjls
No.526640
pR6ju0
No.526646
>>526632
>>526634
Nope lmao, GCs didn't even ask for EWS, your mahamanav teli brought it as a strategic move to push the 50% limit, thankfully based Supreme Court judges classified it separately from (indian) based rejerbhation.
Remove EWS nobody would care, and if some of them chimpout, they are justified, they are justified according to your own beliefs, just like the bhangis would.
if anons here are promised free access to your maa behen's chuut by you, they aren't going to decline it, will they? can you really blame them for chimping out if you later backtrack and they chimpout? you see rejerbhation is like that, a drug, an illusion, to otherwise hopeless masses of lundia.
less than 2% of bhangis get benefitted by it, still everyone wants it.
20zaaA
No.526647
>>526623
>Poorfag GCs were cracking exams without rejerbhation for decades without any help for gibermint.
True though, rewarding incompetence is not a good thing. If any actually capable st and sc do exist they will make it themself.
dQWsRk
No.526652
>>526615(OP)
I support EWS reservations provided govt makes the rules more just and the procedure for obtaining it more strict and fair, it is the most abused reservations as of now, visit jeeneetards anytime you will know
dQWsRk
No.526653
>>526652
Only reservations I believe should be removed is the women reservations. I don't think I need to elaborate why.
pR6ju0
No.526658
>>526652
EWS is as abused as OBC - NCL, yeah lundia is corrupt, nothing new under the son, in states like maharashtra many OBCs get SC certs made for them too, just bribe the tahsildar, anyone get made any certificate made, in WB they were literally selling them
all of this is not due to EWS, it is because of rejerbhation, and that is because of gibermint which gets elected by bhangis and chamars.
Imagine being a rejerbhation putra and talking about fairness lmao, there is no fairness in this turd world hell hole, and never will be, infact things will get a lot worse.
pR6ju0
No.526662
>>526653
why exactly? if (indian) and income based rejerbhations are valid then what is the issue with gender based rejerbhation?
rejerbhation was and is a slippery slope, abhi to bohot neeche jaana hai bro.
dQWsRk
No.526663
>>526658
Yaar I ofc implicitly also mean OBC NCL checking should be done strictly as well.
Many richfags abuse both NCL and EWS
I am GC btw my (indian) is too small to get reservations and the elites refused SC status in 60s and later OBC in 90s
dQWsRk
No.526667
>>526662
Because women's reservations are almost a net waste. Most of these foids will only end up marrying and remaining remaining SAHM mom. I am specifically talking about women who got SOLELY due to women's reservations
Some woman whose college/job improved by women's reservations than it would have been without it, would have made it EITHER WAY
But say someone is making it SOLELY due to women's reservations (say 10k rank in jee advanced getting a good iit by women's reservations ) more often than not they get into betabuxxing
You give an SC boy, ST boy, EWS boy, an OBC boy a reservation opportunity and it actually goes to creating a family
u+iymT
No.526688
>>526663
>am GC btw my (indian) is too small to get reservations
are you uc? if not, how does it feel being a non-uc GC?
dQWsRk
No.526694
