Recent Posts
IFS in Japan
Serious
Paggan pyari
BBC woke shitshow
Aura is indeed real
BBC(Big Bihari Cock)
How frank are your parents with you?
Late Night Thread - /LNT/
Trimmed pubes
Next PM Candidate
ZamZam Jaggu
I think they are related
Bharatchan Lore Thread- Iceberg edition
Buddha
Teli/Ghanchi
Ab zafar
Did I Maxx it out?
Yahudi terror will end soon
IFS babu homes abroad
Indian woman diplomat spying for Pakistan
IFS babu's home in London
I witnessed suicide
Reminder
pajeet anon ass thread #2

ckh08L
No.514212
>Jasvir Singh: 'I'm a devout Sikh - and married to a man'
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-64496456
Paggi yaar

ckh08L
No.514218
Homosexuality is high in Sikh men. Get over it Hindu
cdpWdL
No.514223
>>514212(OP)
based ngl
Dharmic religions don't prohibit LGBTQ rights
Any Dharmic person who opposes ts is just an Abrahamic ngga with Hindu Aesthetics ...

ckh08L
No.514228
>>514223
I only follow Vedic religion, not shit after that. So you can your fagoótry to yourself
otvJN4
No.514515
>>514228
Vedic religion doesn't care about it tbh, so it boils down to how you view it socially. Vedas existed in time when homosexuality is not addressed so it is more lenient about homosexuality than the smritis are. Vedik religion is not some seperate faith of its own, as retards think as a cop out. We Brahmins are getting tired of your bullshit at this point.
>>514223
>Dharmic religions don't prohibit LGBTQ rights
मैथुनं तु समासेव्य पुंसि योषिति वा द्विजः ।
गोयानेऽप्सु दिवा चैव सवासाः स्नानमाचरेत् ॥ ११.१७४ ॥
If a twice-born man commits an unnatural sexual act with a male, or has intercourse with a woman in an ox-cart, in water, or during the daytime, he should bathe with his clothes on as expiation.
<(Manusmriti, Chapter 11, Verse 174)
ब्राह्मणस्य रुजः कृत्वा घ्रातिरघ्रेयमद्ययोः ।
जैह्म्यं च मैथुनं पुंसि जातिभ्रंशकरं स्मृतम् ॥ ११.६७ ॥
Striking a Brahmana, smelling what should not be smelled (such as intoxicants), deceitfulness, and sexual intercourse with a man are declared to cause loss of (indian)/status.
<Source: (Manusmriti, Chapter 11, Verse 67)
पुंसि मैथुनकर्तारौ दण्ड्यौ राज्ञा विशेषतः ।
Those who perform sexual intercourse with a man shall be punished by the king with the appropriate penalty.
<Source: Narada Smriti
otvJN4
No.514518
!LXDUEl5p6SLPwtl
cdpWdL
No.514702
>>514515
manusmriti is not really that good of a book to refer to tbh
It's just Quran for normies (as mentioned by another channer a few days back)
6mQmcQ
No.514703
>>514700
You forgot to change IP, faggot. Go back to being a cock sucking troon lmao.
otvJN4
No.514710
>>514702
That's just a confirmation bias, multiple smriti abide by same law. Yajnavalkya, Narada, and other Dharmashastra as well. Vedas themself are pretty form on treating shruti and smriti of equall reverence unless it contradicts wha the Shruti's says. Medhatithi mentions the same in later interpretation. Manusmriti might be the most structurally sound book honestly.
otvJN4
No.514716
>>514700
Change IP next time retard, lmao. Also you all should be happy, it's ok for you LC chamars to he faggots kekekek.
ckh08L
No.514778
>>514716
You are the one explaining how dick sucking is allowed in Hando druma, go hop on some loda as you clearly like, fruity fuck
otvJN4
No.514793
>>514778
>Mentions how homosexuality is punishable
>LC chamar doesn't bother reading the verse
muh vedik durma lmao. Wrap it up LC fag, your people used to suck each other's cocks.





















































