Recent Posts
Total Sepoy Destruction
bad trip
AVG chinese woman
On Sacred Animals
vegcuckbros zara idhar aa
Atul Shubhratri
What do you think of Indian designed and manufactu...
Yaar pajeeta
I'm not religious
help me dear sir's
Norwood thread
Rakulcel status?
Sometimes I genuinely wish I wasn't Indian
Foids lurk on Bhach!!!!!
Which other forums/imageboards do you guys use?
Kaveri Engine
BDL chads March Onwards
New masala lafda just dropped
Marathi bros get in here asap
How to score?
Rename bharatchan to Anti - Intellectual group cha...
aao kahani suno
Thoughts
On Sacred Animals


tR52Dq
No.120754
Having a sacred animal is a retarded thing. Savarkar was correct. Waste of nutrition, and waste of our resources that could be better spent elsewhere. Having a sacred animal offers no benefit to us, and instead enables others to leverage it to mock us. Historically, in Ancient egypt, cats were considered sacred, so their enemies tied cats to their shields, preventing them from fighting and mocking them.
(User has been lingamed for this post )


tR52Dq
No.120761
>>120754(OP)
kek


tR52Dq
No.120770
Think about it. You see Indians seething constantly in videos where people are cooking beef, it's honestly pathetic. If you have a sacred animal, you WILL seethe and be mocked.

!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a

RHC/Zr
No.120772
>>120770
You're the only one seething here
kaPqCt
No.120773
>>120770
XXGCHY
No.120774
>>120770
cow meat restriction was so that people didnt kill cow at the first instance of starvation. our ancients were not stupid, they knew pajeet is dumb and will kill and eat cow if he dont have food, instead of this they made cow sacred and extracted milk for longer. even in china beef was considered something you wouldnt eat, unless the cow died naturally.
even today in europe the most popular meat is pork, same with asian countries. this culture of eating beef comes from americans, who got access to large quantities of bison for free when they landed there and developed a taste for it.


tR52Dq
No.120777
>>120774
Beef is common in europe. Also bison doesn't have anything to do with beef.
BSe+20
No.120778
>>120772
motitroon will larp all about progress and backwardness in lundia but have problem when someone try to break it out of emotional cuckry. you can either reform hinduism for eating meat or it will become irrelevant eventually when many people start realizing reality, how nothing really matters.


tR52Dq
No.120779
>>120773
kek, based.
BSe+20
No.120782
>>120773
its honestly so pathetic, how much more humiliation one has to face to change?


tR52Dq
No.120783
>>120778
motivtroon is a 5'7 vegcuck who bragged about muh discord sex chats as though they are his gfs kek.

!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a

RHC/Zr
No.120784
>>120778
Okay, go become a butcher. Take the first step 🪜
kaPqCt
No.120786
>>120774
Beef is less eaten than pork because pork is just cheap


tR52Dq
No.120788
>>120784
I've fished and killed fish myself.
XXGCHY
No.120789
>>120777
Beef is common now, but #1 is still pork. And it became common only after Americas was settled. Also bison, buffalo, cows all are bovines. Once they developed taste for bison, they nearly drove it to extinction, but cow became a substitute.

!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a

RHC/Zr
No.120790
>>120783
None of you meat faggots will ever post your sloppy fat tard bodies, nor your Bihari and bokachoda faces.
But sure, keep on crying about it


tR52Dq
No.120791
>>120789
>nearly drove it to extinction
That wasn't because of muh taste. It was the natives source of sustenace, clothing, basicallty everything. It was to eradicate the natives.
BSe+20
No.120793
>>120784
yaar, i am not katua, librandu or muzzshit or bheembhangi, indians arent ready to change man. they look at prosperity of other countries but dont want to change at all to become prosperous.


tR52Dq
No.120794
>>120790
Cope and rope.

!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a

RHC/Zr
No.120795
>>120788
Sure, Bokachoda Bihari
XXGCHY
No.120796
>>120784
Yaar chutiye emotions cuck, i have personally killed fish, chicken and quail myself. And thats besides the point of the argument


tR52Dq
No.120797
>>120793
Antinatl, ban this katua gayu!!
kaPqCt
No.120805
>>120784
How does that even matter? What does killing a stock has to do with this arguement?

!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a

RHC/Zr
No.120806
>>120793
>Prosperous countries eat meat
>We should eat meat tooo saar
Coming up next
>Import (by the way I am a nigger)s to rape women en masse or we won't be prosperous saar
>Don't use water, wipe with paper to become prosperous saar
>Promote leftist faggotry and troon operations to be prosperous saar
Faggots


tR52Dq
No.120809
>>120772
I'm not against vegetarianism, if you want to be veg, that's fine. What I'm against is having a sacred animal. Even non hindu vegetarians don't seethe as much Hindu non vegetarians when someone eats beef.
BSe+20
No.120811
>>120806
I am not saying that, i am just saying Indians are badly malnourished and our daily diet lacks nutrition, roti sabji paneer milk also barely completes the need for enough protein.
if not beef, then atleast pork should be industrialized.


tR52Dq
No.120813
>>120806
Mauryas ate meat


VCrssL
No.120814
>>120754(OP)
unironically trve, we should adopt beef en-masse when its viable to lab-grow it.

!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a

RHC/Zr
No.120816
>>120809
You can always beocme a piguddin or a chawal bori, you know.


tR52Dq
No.120818
>>120811
I don't trust pajeets handling pork. Also, I avoid pork for esoteric reasons.


tR52Dq
No.120820
>>120816
The fuck does that mean?

!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a

RHC/Zr
No.120821
>>120813
And did the Mauryas have large meat farms to process that meat?
3iBcku
No.120824


tR52Dq
No.120825
>>120824
Savarkar is libtard??


tR52Dq
No.120828
>>120821
I agree, the modern meat industry is fucked up.
3iBcku
No.120832
>>120825
Yes
India got real independence after 2014
Also enjoy as much as you can because yogi will soon rape your ass for anti nationalist behaviour
CLflcC
No.120833
>>120754(OP)
I once talked to a canadian gymcel who could overhead press 120 kg. He told me he was not some gifted athlete or anything. Just a hobbyist like most gymcels. He said OHPs of 80+ Kgs was not uncommon in gyms there and how you can meet at least one guy even in casual gyms can hit that limit.
Do you know how often I've seen Indians hit 80 kg+ OHP in gyms? 0.


tR52Dq
No.120835
>>120833
True. Most of these guys have their heads in the ground like an ostrich and won't even accept that we have a problem. His hieght and weight?
XXGCHY
No.120836
>>120806
>>Prosperous countries eat meat
>>We should eat meat tooo saar
Thats not even the argument that we are making retard. Human beings are biologically designed to eat the meat of large ruminant animals first and foremost, flesh and organs both. Our second dietary source is fish. Other than this birds, eggs, dairy are also congruent to our biological diet, though not a part of it in large quantities.
Most of the vitamins and minerals you get from plants are not in human digestible forms. On top of that you get so many antinutrients like
>phytates
>lectins
>oxalates
>tannins
>saponins
>goitrogens
>glucosinolates
On top of that fertilizers and heavy metal poisoning. Even insoluble fiber is bad for you; it irritates the gut and causes ibs for a lot of people.
If i put you, motivtroon, in a jungle and tell you to subsist off of plants, you will probably eat something and poison yourself and die like a faggot. Modern vegetables have been a result of selective agriculture. They are not supposed to have so much starch. Just because eating something doesnt kill you immediately, doesnt mean that its good for you.
My whole point being, government should allow the slaughtering of some animals fish, poultry, beef, mutton, pork, etc but put strict regulations on how they are raised and harvested. These days you have stun guns and nitrogen euthanasia for quick and painless death of the animals.
XXGCHY
No.120839
>>120836
The micronutrients from plants are firstly less in quantity, they are worse in quality from a absorption point of view, and they also bring with it antinutrients which will block the little absorption that we were getting in the first place.
CLflcC
No.120840
>>120835
5'6 74 kg I think.


tR52Dq
No.120842


tR52Dq
No.120844
>>120840
Damn.
XXGCHY
No.120845
>>120814
>lab-grow
the whole idea of beef is that its a ruminant animal. you feed it grass, the bacteria in its 4 chambered stomach will take out all the good stuff and put it in the animal, and it will poop out the bad stuff.
with lab grown meat, you just get the taste and texture of meat but the micronutrient profile is not guaranteed.
CLflcC
No.120848
>>120844
Yeah he was a manlet. Professionally just worked in some retail store.
WbQFbp
No.120851
>>120820
apni maa se puch smellyali abdool


tR52Dq
No.120852
>>120851
Not an abdool.
CLflcC
No.120857
>>120848
But he was well read on gymcelling. Told me short height and arms makes for easier OHPs hence his high OHP(on the otherhand being taller with longer arms supposedly makes for easier dead lifts).
Another blackpill post. I once talked to an Indian gymcel who was depressed how naturally stronger westoids were. Apparently he was frequently strength mogged by westoids especially black guys who didn't gymcel at all. They were just regular guys.


tR52Dq
No.120858
>>120855
*jewchure


VCrssL
No.120859


tR52Dq
No.120860
>>120857
His diet?


VCrssL
No.120861
>>120858
kek, true
CLflcC
No.120864
>>120860
This I remember well. Carnivore diet. He said it was so good it cured his autoimmune disease. His gymcel routine was called GZCL.
XXGCHY
No.120866
>>120859
No pyaare, there are hundreds of micros in meat that we have not even studied in human nutrition sciences. This concept of vitamins and minerals is outdated. Recently they discovered C15 in dairy products and other ruminant meat which helps to regulate linoleic acid in your body, and such developments are happening as we go on. lab meat will pretty much never be as good as actual meat. by the time it is good enough as actual meat, they would probably have bioengineered humans to sustain on zog approved insect slop diet. We are progressing further into kaliyuga where people think eating veg carbslop and damaging the body is good for them and killing animals for food is somehow bad.


tR52Dq
No.120867
>>120754(OP)
I feel the conversation has digressed; I wanted to talk about having a sacred animal, not nonveg-veg kanging or pointless namecalling.


tR52Dq
No.120870
>>120866
Interesting, go on.
XXGCHY
No.120875
>>120870


tR52Dq
No.120878
>>120875
Thanks, will take a look.


tR52Dq
No.120880
>>120867
What I'm interested in is why we should have a sacred animal. Muh nonveg veg debate has been going on since day one of bhach.


VCrssL
No.120881
>>120866
Its over, we need to go all in on chicken then it seems


tR52Dq
No.120883
>>120880
To the vegetarians here: Why do you need a sacred animal? If you go by the morality argument, why is one animal elevated above others?


tR52Dq
No.120885
>>120864
Raw or cooked?


tR52Dq
No.120888
>>120883
Waiting for your answer, motivtroon.
CLflcC
No.120890
>>120885
Cooked. Nothing that extreme.
8ztwdc
No.120893
>>120883
hindus have a sacred animal- cow because religion said so
muh morality
muh need
if you need emprical scientific data to follow your religion it means your beleif on god is dead


tR52Dq
No.120896
CLflcC
No.120898
>>120867
Tbh. You can have a good compromise with Heendus. I remember reading that lamb/goats have better nutrient profiles than beef anyway. There's also less harm/pain incurred by these animals in an industrial setting due to their size supposedly.
XXGCHY
No.120902
>>120898
Fish is also a good option, just move to the coast, buy 30 kilo fish in bulk for cheap, store in deep freezer and use for 3 months.


tR52Dq
No.120904
>>120893
I don't think many other religions have sacred animals. A "sacred animal" offers no benefit those who consider the animal sacred and enables the enemies of them to take advantage of this.
>>120898
I'm not campaigning for beef consumption or nonvegetarianism in this thread. Just against the "sacred" status of any animal. Goat tastes better tbh.
>>120902
Seafood mogs any land animal imo.


tR52Dq
No.120910
>>120904
Emphasis on "in this thread".
8ztwdc
No.120915
>>120904
anon your reasoning is retarded, any material can be used as a disadvantage to mock you
I can stick a koran on my shield and mock moslems
Sacred animal serves as much purpose as a stone idol of shiva, it's there because religion demands it
Asking purpose or WHY? in a religion is blasphemous
If you want to follow a religion, follow it without asking or looking for scientific proof for your religion
Read Nietzsche


tR52Dq
No.120917


tR52Dq
No.120921
>>120915
I can't believe your being fr lil bro 💀
CLflcC
No.120927
>>120904
>I'm not campaigning for beef consumption or nonvegetarianism in this thread.
You also have to remember that a lot of Hendus are duplicitous sadly. Everytime I act compromising they come for other meat anyway. No joke I've constantly seen them parrot globohomo vegan propaganda. Suddenly The Guardian and WSJ are trustworthy now. Veganism is gaining traction among Hendus who feel validated by the "soience". It's no longer just a sacred animal. Now, it's sattvic diet or die.


tR52Dq
No.120933
>>120927
What's even more funny is this motherfucker got the complete opposite of what nietzche was trying to preach. Can't believe people here are this retarded.
XXGCHY
No.120934
Honestly it doesnt even matter what you eat.
If a person eats trash diet, then they will suffer.
If a person eats good diet, then they will prosper.
Just focus on what you eat personally, if someone else is eating trash who cares, its just reducing competition.
8ztwdc
No.120936
>>120921
Religion itself is retarded
But asking muh reasoning behind religion is more retarded anon
Religion breaks the moment you question the divine authority of god
If you want to eat to beef go ahead but asking heendu why do you not eat cow is just low iq


tR52Dq
No.120938
>>120936
Interested to see their arguments. Not one person has attacked my criticism of having a sacred animal in the first place, opting for ad-hominems and criticizing nonvegetarianism.
bdjdcz
No.120940
>>120754(OP)
Eat what you want, beef is overrated anyways. Seafood is far more better to try


tR52Dq
No.120942
>>120940
*Indian beef. I agree, seafood mogs everything else to oblvion. I'm not even talking about beef consumption in the first place. More focused on the "Sacred" status given to a singular animal.
bdjdcz
No.120947
>>120942
>More focused on the "Sacred" status given to a singular animal.
I don't think that matter tbh, maybe it was considered important at that point as in the absence of factory farming, excessive killing of an animal for consumption can actually cause its scarcity even though cows are livestock. But yeah it is meaningless now.
8ztwdc
No.120948
>>120938
you're argument itself is retarded
If sacred animals can be used to mock you or against you then anything that is material can be used too, a sacred symbol like cross can create as much confusion in the battlefield as you want to
Sticking koran on my chest will make the moslems stop attacking because it's sacred


VCrssL
No.120950
>>120942
religion is a rationalisation ananmas, this follows from schope's belief that religion uses myths to communicate useful beliefs to sub 80s so that they follow it without question.
Frequent famines influenced the usefulness of a cow methinks. The crops could rot, the land could fail, but never the cow, the cow would always provide nourishment with milk and other milk derivatives.
8ztwdc
No.120954
>>120933
Read on his argument against god and why scientific advancement has made people question God's authortity


tR52Dq
No.120955
>>120950
What about goats? And other animals that yield milk? If the crops rot, and the land fails, won't the cow die?


tR52Dq
No.120956
>>120948
There's a difference between a symbol being defaced and a sacred animal being killed. A hindu would rather burn the bhagavad gita, than consume beef.
8ztwdc
No.120959
>>120956
a hindu should rather kill himslef rather than doing both of these things


VCrssL
No.120960
>>120955
I'd wager the cow can survive on more dire circumstances, also maybe has something more to do with the difference between goat and cow milk? Its all conjecture


tR52Dq
No.120961
>>120959
If I put a gun to your mother's/wife's/daughter's head, and you weren't allowed to suicide, which would you pick?


tR52Dq
No.120965
>>120954
You're getting the complete opposite of what he preached.


tR52Dq
No.120969
>>120960
It's all conjecture. Nothing concrete.
8ztwdc
No.120971
>>120961
I don't think my opinion matters because I don't care about religion anyways
I would rather eat beef
burn the gita if I was a hardcore hindu and believed in it
8ztwdc
No.120972
XXGCHY
No.120977
>>120960
Cow was also a unit of currency. More cow means rich person, so they were collecting cows. Killing a cow during a camine would be like putting fire to your money stacks in winter for warmth. You can just use that money to buy petrol and wood and burn those for longer. Similarly you can keep the cow and drink its milk to sustain yourself longer. Without refrigeration, beef will go bad in 3-4 days, how is a family of 5-6 people supposed to eat 500 fuckin kilos of beef in 3 days. Thats why we didnt kill cows.


VCrssL
No.120983
>>120969
thinking about it, maybe has to do with animism amongst indo-aryans and consumption of milk, a reliable protein source than anything they had at that time. Perhaps they weren't very familiar with goats at that time.


VCrssL
No.120984
>>120977
see, the point is, why was the cow a unit of currency and not other animals?
XXGCHY
No.120985
>>120984
It just so happened to be the animal available to them with the max output for min input, so it became sacred.
The question as to why not goats. Goats are smaller so harder to herd. Goats are also aggressive and fight each other and also fight other animals so probably not preferred. Goatmilk is also grassy flavoured maybe that was offputting.


tR52Dq
No.120986
>>120984
Interesting. I guess cows are more expensive to raise. That way, inflation would be controlled.


tR52Dq
No.120994
>>120986
If I had to select an animal to be used as currency, the criterion I would maximise are:
1)Utility of the animal: So that there is inherent value in the currency.
2)Cost of raising the animal/rarity/k-selection: So that inflation is checked, if the currency was say rabbits, we'd have zimbabwe tier inflation.
3iBcku
No.121000
Kal mene millions microbes kha liye bhaiyo :((((
Me hindu ke name pe kalank hu 😭😭😭😭me murderer hu, mujhe ab nark jana pade ga bhut gand pat rhe ha😰
kaPqCt
No.121004
>>120984
>why was the cow a unit of currency and not other animals?
Cows have a stable rate of value. They produce stable milk all their life time. If fed right, all cows will weight almost same. The difference could be looked at by size alone. A single cow is easier to handle than a dozen of goats. Goats are very weak. They could easily get preyed by dogs, foxxes and other wild animal. A cow is not so. Aforementioned reasons were why cow a stable currency.


tR52Dq
No.121005
>>121000
Brother, calm down. You're human, not God — mistakes happen to everyone. "I ate millions of microbes" — bro, we all unknowingly eat millions of microbes every day. They're in the air, water, and food. This is not a sin, it's a law of nature.
Even in Hinduism, it's explained that intention matters the most. If you're not harming anyone deliberately, then you're not a sinner or a murderer.
Don't get caught up in fears of hell and all that — you're alive, and as long as you're alive, improvement is always possible. If you're seeking purification, then:
Pray sincerely – God understands everything. Ask for forgiveness; it will lighten your heart.
Observe a day of fasting – for cleansing of both body and mind.
Eat pure (satvik) food and meditate – it will bring you peace.
And most importantly: don’t be so harsh on yourself. Eating microbes is not a sin — it’s natural. God gave you the ability to think and learn — use it.
You are not a disgrace. You are a living human being — someone who realized something happened and wants to become better. That’s the greatest virtue.
If you want, I can also give you some mantras or meditation techniques to help calm your mind. Just let me know.
XXGCHY
No.121007
>>121004
>They produce stable milk all their life time.
No they dont.
Cows have to be pregnant or recently delivered to give milk. Before we had artificial insemination, cows would have to be impregnanted by bull and produce baby to give milk. If a cow lives for 15 years she can only give milk for 7.5 years. They can start giving milk at age 2.5 and continue till age 10. 10 to 15 fertility is low so no milk.


VCrssL
No.121008
3iBcku
No.121009
I recently eat beef at jantar mantar guys, i hope bjp forgive me 😰 i don't want "anti nationalist" badge (〒﹏〒)
kaPqCt
No.121011
>>121007
>cows produce stable milk all their lifetime
<now they don't
>goes onto talk about pregnancy of cows and age as if its not obvious
🤨
0yH9zH
No.121014
Or nobody wanted to disrupt the status quo. As is the case many times for inane practices.
kaPqCt
No.121016
>>121008
Buddhist
+
Vaishnavas
+
India is a an extremely fertile land. Most probably they just didn't need meat all the time. When buddhist ravaged the lands with their vegcuckism people were probably influneced by it for a long time. They held onto the no keel animal waah emotions for a while. Even after its banishment, the emphatical values stayed. Also vaishnavism was there with their scared cow beliefs.
Most of the general population were always poor as fuck with tons of fertile land. Cattles were needed for their labour and it would have been extremely frowned upon when a cattle was killed for food. Thats also the reason why most of the history didn't eat much cattle as primary. They were more valuable than food.
Most societies that ate beefs were either evergreenland or extreme food scarcity that they couldn't help but slaughter some cattles once a while.
Oyrh8y
No.121023
>>120866
Sirs where to learn more on this topic
As for vitamins and minerals is an outdated concept
My whole biochem studies disagree
But I would still like to know more since when I incorporated milk and eggs in my diet i have become a lot healthier ad compared to getting the same proteins and macros from pure veg sources
Plus I just feel really good
Oyrh8y
No.121025
Also extreme retardation still ensure in bhach seeing the general level of discourse in this thread


VCrssL
No.121027
Oyrh8y
No.121029
>>121027
Sea of retarded bhai
I ignore it and keep my mouth shut. I don't argue with dogs every time they bark either. I don’t care what they think and it's not my job to be the reality police. The very idea of fighting the stupidity is itself intrinsically idiotic, given the way in which the most obviously apt metaphor is King Canute trying to fight the sea.
Oyrh8y
No.121030
>>121029
Retardry*
kaPqCt
No.121031
>>121027
Hinduism acknowledges animism but that doesn't mean it prohibits from eating animals. Animal sacrifices proves that. Hinduism is infact one the most animist religion.
>the tree is actually a god
>the cow was actually a god
>the deer is actually a rishi
>the bull is actually a symbol of yuga
Cattle was just too expensive to eat. Also Hinduism is too metal for veganism.
0yH9zH
No.121034
>>121030
The pseud is right, this is still one of the better threads.


VCrssL
No.121036
>>121031
Not saying that animism necessarily causes the prevention of animal slaughter, but the reverence of the cow was prolly due to animistic beliefs
lEPFPg
No.121038
>>121034
Absolute state
tb9DF2
No.121040


VCrssL
No.121041
0yH9zH
No.121042
>>120942
Then why even use picrel in the first place? Stop being a retarded faggot, rv
0yH9zH
No.121043
>>121041
Its futile, the BhCh ecosystem is so downtrodden that it simply does not allow anything productive.


VCrssL
No.121044
>>121043
Kek, (you) and me are part of the rot, but its still a bit early to call.
0yH9zH
No.121046
>>121044
That is true, i browse for the occasional worthwhile posts but I believe it will devolve into even more misery as if it is even possible.
tb9DF2
No.121047


VCrssL
No.121049
>>121046
The site will die off if there isn’t more drama/engagement baiting to sustain it. Unfortunately, there’ll only be engagement baiting if it sustains itself. Goodnight, anon. May there be nuggets of gold in a landfill.
kaPqCt
No.121053

AqBawq
No.121054
>>120754(OP)
I truly miss milk.
If you can figure it out in such a way that doesn't cause arthritis and crap you are really lucky.


EQ4edL
No.121055
>>121054
>milku causes arthiritis
da hell? naw what everythang causes sum disease or the other. how much of it is just a jewish psyop anan? Like they sell these lies to give covid poison like vaccines to the cows and chimkins they were talking about last month


EQ4edL
No.121056
>>120754(OP)
true tbh. imagine instead of selling those cow meat to the blaady katmullas both domestically and internationally, if we could feed the handu upper caste gwareebs, we would have a much stronger and well developed military aged male fighting force.
Other edible thangs would be cheaper too but nyooo the baniyas and the jains have to profit from their monopoly over its export.
If they actually get rid of the muslims for good, I guess it could come back like the vedic taimes but it is highly unlikely.
>>120774
>cow meat restriction was so that people didnt kill cow at the first instance of starvation.
yaar it was just sum property law and because cows are so valuable for which people literally went to war for back in tribal days an sheit, strict punishment was imparted because of it.
>>120783
yaar why do you do this all the taime? go back


tR52Dq
No.121067


tR52Dq
No.121068
>>121042
That's not the core point of discussion here.

vxw8/1
No.121069
>>120790
If we are to be completely fair, no one wants to see their inbred faces, subhuman skinny arms or their fat jiggly boy tits.

vxw8/1
No.121070
>>121031
If anything their is just a common ground of agreement that "their are certain animals that only a complete subhuman will eat". Similarly their is also a "thess animals who are just too important to kill".
Anything other than that, when it comes to diet is strictly a matter of one's sampradaya, and that is something we all need to find peace with. One will have to understand that Vaishnava do not eat meat because lord resides in everything, and while one may say meat, he can respect another man for not eating it.
Similarly one has to find some peace with the Shakta sampraday that follow animal sacrifice, in same manner, knowing in the end the soul shall return to its maker. You can't force other to abide by dietary preference of your sampraday, and it is something people have to shake hands on no matter how much it pisses them off.

!XShledrwphaLWim
soa/7f
No.121105
>>120754(OP)
Not eating meat is uber retarded. No wonder pajeets are such dysgenic subhumans.
3iBcku
No.121109

!XShledrwphaLWim
soa/7f
No.121112
>>121109
>Hindustan
>Hindus
>using words made by middle-eastern invaders
yaar pajeet kab seekhoge tum
9a5ss6
No.121113
>>121047
This guy has been mindraped by janny kek


tR52Dq
No.121114
>>121034
You still need to filter out all the retards who add nothing to the discussion.


tR52Dq
No.121115
>>121014
Most likely this, it just stuck. Even if currency shifted away from cows to coins, the same obsolete respect carried on.
NSrx4c
No.121176
>>121113
sure dumeel sandas cleaner sure. i totally wrote bareme like a hsl dumeel lemur
/sn/S2
No.121194
>>121113
btw how convenient is it that you managed to get 2 ''meri maa'' ss to post against me. (against me) the guy who has been lurking here for 2 years now and supposedly got filtered twice within the same hour?? kek do you dumeels not realise how pathetic your attempts at larping are. sub 80 iq populace for a reason ig kekda
btw my picrel has proof of you replying to my post by checking the post numbers whereas you have no proof that i even created those threads(spoiler: i didnt. ask gayaush to check ips ig). also both your ss have hindi written in a soythie flair like our verified dumeel TL does. so go figure. now about being mindraped we can definitely conclude that you fucked up so bad that you had to create larps so that you wouldnt be mocked. imagine an existence being so pathetic. only in lungiland kek. closing reminder to you soythies - nakal karne ke liye bhi akal lagti hai
https://bharatchan.com/board/b/thread/120690
baaki idhar toh tumne bohot cope kiya hi tha wont read bolke kek. apne baap ka toh proof hai na ya padosi tumhari maa ki garmi ko thanda karta hai lol

!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a

RHC/Zr
No.121247
>>121105
You are literally a poop eater.
Also, this thread is still alive. Absolute state of meat seethers.

fg3sUm
No.121258
>>120754(OP)
people who defend eating meat are always the ones who eat it , so they will have to defend eating it anyways and they also change hinduism acc. to their own convenience to justify them eating meat.
Most of the people in Haryana are vegetarian but still most olympiic medals come from their .
olympic bronze medalist sushil kumar is a pure vegetarian like most of them.
vedas clearly state not eat meat .
if you still want eat it pls eat it but do not incorporate hinduism saying that it allows you to eat meat. You can do anything if you want to but ultimately its all KARMA.
I am pure vegetarian , 193 cm ,90 kgs.

!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a

RHC/Zr
No.121261
>>121258
These Biharis will keep crying about how not eating enough meat made them short ugly goblins while they brah about how they ate fish one time or killed a chicken like a tony goblin one day.

fg3sUm
No.121265
>>121261
haha you are right
0e1+GZ
No.121278


tR52Dq
No.121283
>>121247
To be fair DGH is more dysgenic looking than any vegcuck here.


tR52Dq
No.121284
Motivanon, what's your response to >>120883?

!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a

RHC/Zr
No.121311
>>121284
All non human animals are equally sacred.
But I think certain animals are special, depending on their degree of domestication or natural intellect.
For example, dogs have an awareness that lets them maintain different sets of behaviour and persona when interacting with other dogs, with humans, and with other animals.
Then there are some domesticated abimals. For example, Aurochs no longer exist in the wilds, we have domesticated cows completely. Horses too. We owe a degre of responsibility towards domesticated animals to treat them fairly because we are responsible for their existence and suffering.
Then there are wild animals with human-like societies and behaviour such as crows and elephants. They have funerals for the deceased, and demonstrate compassion, understanding, friendship, vengeance and many other human attributes. Apparently crows, whales etc have their own languages and dialects too.
I think such animals too deserve a degree of reverence as a reminder that humans are not automatically above nature by virtue of being uniquely chosen to have those attributes.
Then there are other animals, which we somehow decide are not deserving of our care and respect simply because we have chosen to be blind to understanding them.
I don't hold animals to human standards. But in most societies, we have developed past the need to consume animals. Rather, we are selectively choosing to consume them despite having other sources of nutrition, while at the same time farming them en masse and pushing them in the meat grinder just to have fat ogres and goblins amongst humans to consoooom.
The few cases where it's justifiable would be if we were living some life such as Mongol herders, or Siberian Turks or Buryats who cannot cultivate or trade enough nutritious food.
qy3XZz
No.121353
>>121311
>Rather, we are selectively choosing to consume them despite having other sources of nutrition
Pls go and study about these other sources of nutrition. Check whether their nutrients are in human bioavailable forms. Check the quantity of said nutrients. Check the antinutrients. Etc.
>farming them en masse and pushing them in the meat grinder just to have fat ogres and goblins amongst humans to consoooom
Stupid argument. They are fat ogres and goblins precisely due to eating a processed slop diet. If they ate a natural human diet consisting of mainly animal products, everyone would be at their best health conditions. No heart disease, no diabetes, no obesity, etc. Funny how you hold two opposing beliefs at the same time.
Industrial farmed animals are okay so long as they are raised optimally and butchered painlessly. No halal bullshit. Every animal (including ourselves) will die one day, now whether they die and end up in my stomach or they die and end up being decomposed by bacteria is not my concern, point is that they die.
>humans are not automatically above nature by virtue of being uniquely chosen to have those attributes.
You made the correct argument that humans are not above nature and then you went on to ramble about how eating animals is bad. Pure retardness.
If we are not above nature, then we have to adhere to nature's rules and eat what we have biologically evolved to eat, which is meat.
If we one day become above nature, maybe we become a spacefaring race who has conquered the galaxy, maybe then we would have enough technology to monitor all our biomarkers properly, and design a food which is completely vegan and still gives us all our nutrition.
In the bhagvad gita, the satvik-rajasic-tamasic foods description only gives you the qualities of food like juicyness, sweetness, sourness, temperature, pungent, etc. It doesnt specifically ban meat. But there is another verse in the bhagvad purana (iirc) which says that kalki will destroy all the meat eaters. But the nuance is that this event is gonna happen at the end of kaliyuga, by which point humans would have evolved significantly both biologically and technologically to a level where meat eating would not be necessary. And in those conditions, if you eat meat without neccessity, you are commiting a sin. Rest assured you can eat meat at this point in time.
Also know that a person can only eat a finite amount of meat in his whole lifetime. Lets say i eat 6 eggs a day and some dairy and 250g meat per day. This means that in a year i would eat around 91kg meat. Or you can say 91 chickens in a year. If i live 100 years, i would have eaten 9100 chickens in my whole life. This is probably counted as nimit karma (karma which was required for survival) and we wouldnt get any sin for it. However if i eat lets say 50,000 chickens in my whole life im probably incurring lots of sin because im eating more than needed. Which means inneccessant killing, therefore sin.

!XShledrwphaLWim
soa/7f
No.121379
>>121247
Oye motivanon saale kabhi is forum se bhi bahar nikal. Saala naa aand ke gyaan chode brahmaand ke. Kitni baar bola mai sandas anon nhi hu.
q2IETu
No.121420
>>121379
holy shit sandasanon is back. abb gayaush ki maa chudegi kekekekekekek

!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a

RHC/Zr
No.121452
>>121379
Sure, whatever happened to Sandaschan
q2IETu
No.121472
>>121428
rv lodu you cant play on behalf of mod kek. also youve no proof that it was me in that ss. you will try to cope by saying wall of xyz everytime because you cant do anything about it
q2IETu
No.121474
>>121428
btw check the picrels atleast and tell me the irony randi ke pille

!XShledrwphaLWim
soa/7f
No.121618
>>121452
Ruk jao yaar. Plan is underway.
06BQWB
No.121620
>>121506
/sn/S2
No.121627
fYYpIM
No.121628
>>121247
is poop veg or non veg?
06BQWB
No.121629
>>121627
Archive/pdf?
/sn/S2
No.121631
>>121629
apni maa se puch

fg3sUm
No.121636
>>121628
depends on what the person ate last night
06BQWB
No.121638
>>121631
Par teri maa ne to mujhe bata diya
/sn/S2
No.121656
>>121638
source iski maa ki gaand
06BQWB
No.121663
>>121656
Mindbroken


VCrssL
No.121669
>half decent thread turns into shit flinging session
yaar dayush, this is the effect of your nignoggery
q2IETu
No.121690
>>121663
source iski maa ki gaand
q2IETu
No.121692
>>121669
apni maa chudale bhangi ke bacche