Recent Posts
based Imran hashmi edits share the edits yaaar ,these chappri edita of imran hasmhi and pre 2010 bollywood songs are my guilty pleasure yaaar
3PwshN
No.1637
>>1636(OP)
>Will bollywood cuck?
Yes, they will make us lose our money and make us feel like a cuck in the cinema halls
PyyNxX
No.1740
>>1636(OP)
>movie glazing and aura farming Paki mullas
Seems like Bollywood dream project. I shan’t be watching.
Vox+cH
No.1749
>>1636(OP)
i hope it dies, i hope all the kapooors khans become relevant
QGa4aK
No.1752
>>1636(OP)
Final verdict? I am seeing muthalman and lefty reviewers seething but /b/hacels are also seething.
8J357S
No.1766
>>1636(OP)
KGF was better, Animal is still the best.
Very bad acting by R Madhavan.
Akshaye Khanna was the best written character.
Sanjay Dutt was the best acting character followed by Ranbir Singh.
Soumya Tandon looked very old.
The counterpart heroine of Ranbir Singh as ugly as the heroine of Animal.
8J357S
No.1767
>>1752
Muslims are seething because the terrorists were showing doing Namaz before carrying out Mumbai Taj attacks.
Bhach is seething because the movie didn't glorified Hinduism even a bit. The main character played by Ranbir Singh is a punjabi criminal turned soy patriot who has nothing to do with religion. In times of distress he only remembers his past of crime and not Hindu religion.
2zUvfx
No.1768
>>1766
animal was a chootiya movie. why do people like it is beyond me.
htEA30
No.1769
>>1767
I don't care about hinduism, my question is why is character not named hindu
He is named some pugchod
8J357S
No.1770
>>1769
yeah and even the defense minister in the starting had Kapoor surname.
Bollywood is run by khatris so they shill their surnames.
zvY7RI
No.1771
I wouldn't be surprised if there comes a Part 3 as well because there are too many guys left to kill.
x2F2Mq
No.1773
Aditya Dhar the director is a Kashmiri Pandit. He belongs to the leftist-islamist urban naxal cabal.
Two scenes proved that-
1- The wife of Rehman Baloch slaps him in hospital and he takes it. Its plain feminist propaganda. (In Animal the Male protagonist slaps the female, which is pro-tradition).
2- The main character marries a girl 10-12 years younger rhan him, remember her father talks to him and tells him that "she is only 19 years old and he must be 30-32". Its plain Islamist propaganda to normalize the large age gap between partners in a marriage to justify Muhammad and Aisha's age gap. (In Animal the Male protagonist talks about the child bearing large hips of the female thus pronatalism propaganda to increase Fertility Rate among Hindus).
You are open to judge both the movies and their directors now
al9Js9
No.1783
>>1767
>movie didn't glorified Hinduism even a bit
>literally starts with bhagwat geeta quote, anyway the fact that it didn't glorify islam or anything islamic is a good thing in itself, cause bwood does that a lot
al9Js9
No.1784
>>1773
>Aditya Dhar the director is a Kashmiri Pandit. He belongs to the leftist-islamist urban naxal cabal
>that's not true at all, if anything quite the opposite, no movie in bollywood has openly showed pakis and mullahs as eternal enemies of hindu as this one, so director is def right wing guy, maybe he fumbled a lil bit in few places but he is def an asset to indian right wing, we shouldn't dismiss him like this
x2F2Mq
No.1788
>>1784
to merely demonize pakis based on their nationality is a liberal line of propaganda why happens in every army related Indian movie. But yes I'd appreciate the scene where the mumbai terrorists are shown doing namaz in the fake currency note factory and in the next scene the ISI oficer watches mumbai terror attacks on TV and chants Allah Hu Akbar with others repeatedly.
