Recent Posts
2+PeHW
No.552195
What was actually happening in the medieval indian battlefields? Why were rajputs losing so many battles? Was it numbers? Battle hardening? Tech?
2+PeHW
No.552202
>>552199
Before that. I asked what was happening in the battlefields
W8hTpE
No.552203
>GTB samefagging again
saged
W8hTpE
No.552204
>>552202
shameless samefagging
2+PeHW
No.552205
>>552203
Madarchod i am not gtb, I have a genuine question
2+PeHW
No.552206
>>552204
Kya bak rha bhosdike
W8hTpE
No.552210
W8hTpE
No.552211
No further reply, heres (you) in advance
jUeQAm
No.552216
>>552202
Sultanate and Mughals were superior in war tech and better fighters. That's it. They cucked Rajputs and take their women. Majority of Rajput Royal house served Muslims for centuries and then Britishers.
<Jiska jitna bda lath uski dadagiri
jUeQAm
No.552217
>>552210
And they lost enough, no ethnicity of India ever served Muslims more than Rajputs. Cope more
2+PeHW
No.552218
>>552210
>How many muthlims do you think tried to invade india,
Arabs tried and were fairly successful too, sindh was under arab rule for a good period of time actually.
But i am talking against the turkics. How easy was it becoming for them to just ravage through rajputs like chittor, etc. what was actually happening in the battlefields? Why were rajputs losing
lii2TT
No.552219
Gunpowder
2+PeHW
No.552220
>>552216
Can you describe a medieval battlefield? Were rajputs chutiya to not include new fighting styles? Were they not learning anything? Did their fortification help nothing?
2+PeHW
No.552221
mMvHxH
No.552225
>>552195(OP)
Horse archers from central asia mogged infantry until guns changed nature of warfare.
4uXOWt
No.552229
>>552195(OP)
>>552220
>abuse shudras, avarnas for millenia
>progress in Shudra and avarna jobs stagnate
>turks come in with the mongol invention of the new saddles
>btfo entire civilisations with better horses, better saddles
>turns out abusing (indian)s that rear Horses, work in leather, carpenters is not a good idea
.
lii2TT
No.552230
>>552221
Depends on which battle you are talking about.
Mewar campaigns against Delhi sultanate were great.
2+PeHW
No.552233
>>552229
This is BS and propaganda. Keep it for some other bait thread
jUeQAm
No.552235
>>552220
>Were rajputs chutiya to not include new fighting styles
Are Iranians chutiyas for not including B-2 type bombers in their attacks on Israel? Jiski lathi uski bhains(Rajputni) kek
W8hTpE
No.552236
>>552232
intelligent anon
4uXOWt
No.552237
>>552233
>anything I don't like can be dismissed with propaganda
Riddle me this handu why are so many blue collar jobs taken over by muslims
2+PeHW
No.552238
>>552230
Let's say for example khiljis campaigns?
And even before that gazhni and ghuri? They were Pettu raiders
W8hTpE
No.552242
mMvHxH
No.552243
>>552229
>Muh saar cast system bad saar.
We were able to repel greeks, arabs, huns and contain scythians for centuries, chomu. Cast system didnt have anything to do with turkic superiority in warfare. Tere hisab se persians, arabs, byzantines bhi cast system ki wajah se haare aur itne saal tak ghulam rahe the kya, chutiye?
2+PeHW
No.552244
>>552237
Because most of the converts in india are lc descants
2+PeHW
No.552245
>>552243
He's baiting, don't reply. I am here for genuine discussion
2+PeHW
No.552247
>>552242
I am not
W8hTpE
No.552248
>>552241
>arguing with a muzzie
NGMI, the only information he has is from "ummah power" instagram reels
4uXOWt
No.552251
>>552243
Mongolians has better horses and saddles, and civilisations that didn't focus on saddles and horses got btfo. India despite having dedicated (indian)s for horse rearing and carpentry couldn't come close,
2+PeHW
No.552253
>>552241
Then why did delhi never see a hindu ruler after prithviraj.
I mean, they were successful in raids but the rulers were still the turks right
4uXOWt
No.552254
>>552244
That is not the sole reason and you know it.
2+PeHW
No.552255
>>552251
It's not just about that I think, do you think india could ever produce battle hardened warriors like central asia? No because india is the land of abundance
95pTh3
No.552256
he is a rajpoop, but hiz maadhar is a muzzie
tat is why he constantly switches b/w both personas so agressively
>then why gobard kanging
cause his maadhar gobard his genes
4uXOWt
No.552257
>>552245
I am not baiting, if you don't like my posts or disagree then post it, am I ragebaiting? I am not, I am posting what I theorise as the reason
lii2TT
No.552258
>>552238
>khiljis campaigns?
He was something else. Single handedly fucked up whole subcontinent.
>gazhni
He conquered Sindh which was under brahmin rule. Arabs were at their peak, yet Sindh resisted first invasion successfully, their kingdom fall only cuz buddhists betrayed them.
>ghuri
Not much idea tbh. Too many we wuuz stories about him and Prithviraj.
4uXOWt
No.552260
>>552255
This is same cope as "Saar indian genes aren't good for football"
lii2TT
No.552261
W8hTpE
No.552264
>>552251
You are too much engrossed in your dreams of muh shudra power and oppression.
and you keep confirming your bias which leads to such shitty opinions without any knowledge. and boom you start seeing it everywhere
>what the thinker thinks, the prover proves
2+PeHW
No.552269
>>552260
When did I even say about genes lodu?
Imagine it
>Indian rajput boy grows in abundance, eats bakre ki roti chaawal, has no actual war experience or commanding armies
>Central Asian tribal has to fight for life, war raw meat, drink horse blood/milk, leading campaigns since may 12
Who do you think will win in a one on one combat?
mMvHxH
No.552271
>>552255
India and even rest of world never had abundant horses like steppes. This natural advantage served turkics and mongols quite well for some time beginning with invention of stirrup and development horse saddle giving them edge over infantries of sedentary civilisations but they lost this edge with development of firearms.
2+PeHW
No.552278
>>552261
>Their territory
Delhi should have been under hindu rule, and even then Delhi sultanate map stretches too much even slave like aibaks to give credit to rajputs about being able to secure any territory
lii2TT
No.552279
He is the muzzie baiter.
I thought he was serious, but nah this retard is just making shit thread asking shit questions.
2+PeHW
No.552282
>>552271
Can you describe how it would have been like in am medieval battlefield against let's say Tughlaq?
2+PeHW
No.552284
>>552279
>shit questions.
If that's what you think, you're free to leave. I Even pointed out the retard shudra
b1h3LO
No.552285
>>552243
>greeks
Chup gawaar, most modern day (indian)s didn't exist back then. Varna system did. Guptas and Mauryas weren't rajus if that's what you really think.
Most (indian)s and sub (indian)s came much later.
2+PeHW
No.552286
>>552258
>He conquered Sindh which was under brahmin rule. Arabs were at their peak, yet Sindh resisted first invasion successfully, their kingdom fall only cuz buddhists betrayed them.
Not just sindh, he raised india almost 10 times, he was a petty raider and literally no one would even bat an eye
mMvHxH
No.552287
Also i dont understand why retards have to constantly bring up muzzies ruled hindus for centuries saar as if its something unique. Are these fuckers unaware of history of centuries of turkic/mongol rule over persia and region spanning ottoman empire?
jUeQAm
No.552288
>>552282
Very brootal, if you rebelled against them and have only few villages with you. They will first defeat you, burn your Village down. Kill fighting men, take others as slaves, select good women as sex slaves(permissible maal-e-ganimat) and sell rest of women in Baghdad market (true)
W8hTpE
No.552291
2+PeHW
No.552297
>>552288
Abe not rebelling, like actual when the rajput and turkics army were face to face. What was actually happening?
2+PeHW
No.552298
>>552291
Kek
mMvHxH
No.552300
>>552285
>Saar there was no cast system back then saar.
Abe chaman chutiye, shunga was a brahmin, chanakya was a brahmin. Kambojas(punjabi/gandharan tribe) also existed and arthashastra mentions various guilds/shrenis. History buff baap ko history mat padha. Terse zada janta hu.
>Guptas and Mauryas weren't rajus if that's what you really think.
Chutiye, who said they were rajputs? They were aristocrats of magadha. Rajput identity originates from rajasthan.
mMvHxH
No.552304
>>552297
Hit and run tactics of horse archers. Rain down arrows and ride back repeatedly until enemy is exhausted or breaks formation.
b1h3LO
No.552305
>>552300
Abey gadhe I said varna system did exist, read properly anharchod.
mMvHxH
No.552309
>>552305
Toh? How does it change anything i said retard? Faltu ki red herring mat kar.
qCrhhU
No.552310
2+PeHW
No.552312
>>552304
Did rajputs not use bow and arrows at all?
Did they not have any planning, formation of guerrilla techniques?
qCrhhU
No.552313
>>552235
Super hot kek Jiski lathi uski Rajputni I suggest not just muslims but every govt or (indian) hindu or muslim or dalit tht gains powers should be given 100 rajputanis for each minister or politician or worker Jiski Lathi Uski Rajputni
(Text Content Sanitized Too.)
mMvHxH
No.552315
>>552312
Horses bhi chahiye. Mongols and turks had more horses. They could rotate multiple horses and replace injured/dead horses easily.
qCrhhU
No.552316
>>552288
Jokes aside you are a dumbass if you give credit to Tughlaqs under whose reign the sultans lost all power even their king got captured lol
(Text Content Sanitized Too.)
jUeQAm
No.552323
>>552316
I know what happened to them, but it's more to do with Babar and his superior military tech. And Tughlaqs were quite good in fort making, infighting and mismanagement led to their demise. Rajputs were serving them as always tho kek
2+PeHW
No.552324
>>552315
Was it actually the case? They cross long difficult terrains like hindu kush to end up here, do you think they could maintain such logistics?
W8hTpE
No.552328
>>552324
>asks for reason
>doesnt accepts the reasom
>keeps moving the conversation to one direction
yeah "genuine" post GTB
mMvHxH
No.552330
>>552324
Mongols and turks would march with their herds. Horses can walk and graze, dimwit. Nomadic pastoralism 101
jUeQAm
No.552331
>>552313
It must have been a sight to see. Well, if and hen I get sucees and power I'll take 5 Rajputni as concubine to humiliate Raju kangers further and to keep their ancient tradition alive kek
W8hTpE
No.552332
>>552331
quick switch the IP nowww
2+PeHW
No.552333
>>552328
Bhak chutiya, I am stating facts. It was actually very difficult to maintain huge armies. How do you think they would feed them?
2+PeHW
No.552335
>>552332
Don't reply that chamar is just trying to derail
W8hTpE
No.552336
>>552333
lul, midwit
jUeQAm
No.552337
>>552324
They had access to multiple civilisation directly, western to Persian and Chinese. Indian kings had inferior tech so they lost
mMvHxH
No.552346
>>552333
>t. 90iq
Tujhe puri military science padhni hai kya? I wont give hours long lecture for free.
>How do you think they would feed them?
Which is why they often returned after raiding and looting like ghaznavids, timur, nadir shah did. Those that chose to stay after conquering often lost territories in central asia due to disconnect and lost their turkic nomadic ways until another wave of fresh turkic horse archers arrive and replace or btfo the older ones.
2+PeHW
No.552358
>>552346
Raids took long enough, as long as 6 months. I think they were definitely bribing or looting locals on their way. So my question is how were they maintaining so many horses that they could even rotate those when confronted by rajput forces
E7kIRz
No.552362
Stupid ass post by baiters
But I will just mention there was nothing too special about any invader till British period People forget india had already seen many turks scythians hunas for centuries who used same curved bow hit and run tactics horse
(Text Content Sanitized Too.)
mMvHxH
No.552365
>>552358
Grass is the best but horses can live off grains. Just feed them grains from conquered kingdom.
