Recent Posts
GKrPyv
No.454461
Mujhe saaf hawa me saas leni hai, mujhe saaf paani pini hai, mujhe bina kisi milawat ke fal sabji aur meat khani hai.
HZohWh
No.454464
GKrPyv
No.454466
>>454461(OP)
Is this too much to ask
JSoWPh
No.454473
>>454461(OP)
(Text Content Sanitized Too.)
cH8l46
No.454481
>>454464
yaar tum vegcucks dusro pe dabav kyu dalte ho.
i know a baman who is similar , even enforces mi ki teri non-veg eating ko chod ke rahenge, but he gets a hard boner when richfags wear leather shoes/accessory.
we were going for a wedding and he was behaving like an elite, saying
<YE ASLI LEATHER BELT HAI, BOHOT MEHENGI HAI , ISPE THODA SA BHI PAANI GIRA TOH MEHENGA PADEGA
kek
fz4DPQ
No.454483
>>454481
Whats so bad about appriciating good leather?
Never said anything about not killing animals, just dont pollute your body by consuming them
Vnqh5A
No.454486
>>454483
yaaar vegcuck don't you ever get tired of spreading your delusional copes??
3aDHT0
No.454492
>>454483
YAAR pajeet meri marzi jo me khau terko kya. I had this friend since childhood full shakahari and (by the way I am a nigger) is 5'8 atmost. Mere maa baap ne merko har weekend pe merko nonveg khilaya and I am 6 anyone who believes they want good physique but with veggie is just full copium.
GVqhhQ
No.454498
>>454492
You can eat what you want. You can't kill what you want in a Hindu state just to feel better about yourself.
/XIrkY
No.454502
>>454492
Yup relying solely on veg leads to carb overload which is the root cause of insulin resistance
/XIrkY
No.454505
3aDHT0
No.454506
>>454498
I will kill any source of protein except cows. Ain't living a cuck life :-)
GVqhhQ
No.454507
>>454502
India will simply islamize+-balkanize if it doesn't become a HR.
Then you can finally kill everything and fuck your own sister legally without anybody interfering.
/XIrkY
No.454510
>>454507
the opinions of NRI bhangis don't count
3aDHT0
No.454514
>>454507
Hindu rashtra? Kya faida jab merko chamaar bhangi dikhte rahenge har jagah. In my life I have met more tolerant muslims than SC. Just eliminate all these OBC( minus the Upper OBC) and SC
GVqhhQ
No.454516
>>454506
There's no logical reason to spare cows if you have no issue with meat in general.
Hindus that eat meat are pseudo Muzzies.
/XIrkY
No.454518
>>454516
>Hindus that eat meat are pseudo Muzzies.
Most Hindus eat non veg retard even if occasionally so
only like 30% indias population is strictly veg cuck
RmTXpf
No.454520
>>454516
All these meat eaters will convert sooner or later
3aDHT0
No.454521
>>454516
Yaar heendu, mera baap US me kaam karta aur waha ki stories sunata NRI ki , maa kasam NRI se zyada conservative log nahi dekhe mene. Why will I kills cows when cows since ancient times have been used for transport, irrigation, dairy needs ( basically all tasty pajeet dish has some component of dairy) . Chicken, mutton,fish are excellent source of vitamins apart from being protein source and being fucking tasty.heendus need to start eating non veg to be tall and masculine or get cuck out
3aDHT0
No.454523
>>454520
Cope karle brahmin
/XIrkY
No.454524
/XIrkY
No.454528
>>454521
these NRI bhangis are the most filthy bastards
they love parroting patriotism while licking gora boots in mleccha lands kek
/XIrkY
No.454530
3aDHT0
No.454533
>>454529
Iska ghar sabse pehle chudega jab kashmiri mulle aayenge
GVqhhQ
No.454561
>>454520
Pretty much.
Most comfortable way of living if you aren't built for fighting and competing is really just submitting to Muzzies and/or becoming a part of them.
At which point seperating Pakistan Bangladesh Lundia makes 0 sense.
>>454521
janwaron ki hatya karna sakht mana hai aur adharmi hai
3aDHT0
No.454579
>>454561
Yaar heendu tu apni bandi mulle se pilwayega to apni baat apne paas rakh aur hui baat meat khaane ki. Bhishma ne 116 chapter mahabharat me kaha hai ki kshatriya meat kha sakte :--
Bhishma in the 116th chapter of Anushasana Parva of the Mahabharata, declares that Kshatriyas don't commit any sin by eating meat:
"Bhishma said, 'It is even so, O mighty-armed one, as thou sayest. There is nothing on earth that is superior to flesh in point of taste. There is nothing that is more beneficial then flesh to persons that are lean, or weak, or afflicted with disease, or addicted to sexual congress or exhausted with travel. Flesh speedily increases strength. It produces great development. There is no food, O scorcher of foes, that is superior to flesh. But, O delighter of the Kurus, the merits are great that attach to men that abstain from it. Listen to me as I discourse to thee on it. That man who wished to increase his own flesh by the flesh of another living creature is such that there is none meaner and more cruel than he. In this world there is nothing that is dearer to a creature than his life. Hence (instead of taking that valuable possession), one should show compassion to the lives of others as one does to one's own life. Without doubt, O son, flesh has its origin in the vital seed. There is great demerit attaching to its eating, as, indeed, there is merit in abstaining from it. One does not, however, incur any fault by eating flesh sanctified according to the ordinances of the Vedas. The audition is heard that animals were created for sacrifice. They who eat flesh in any other way are said to follow the Rakshasa practice. Listen to me as I tell thee what the ordinance is that has been laid down for the Kshatriyas. They do not incur any fault by eating flesh that has been acquired by expenditure of prowess. All deer of the wilderness were dedicated to the deities and the Pitris in days of old, O king, by Agastya. Hence, the hunting of deer is not censured. There can be no hunting without risk of one's own life. There is equality of risk between the slayer and the slain. Either the animal is killed or it kills the hunter. Hence, O Bharata, even royal sages betake themselves to the practice of hunting. By such conduct they do not become stained with sin. Indeed, the practice is not regarded as sinful.
kgtFzQ
No.454581
>>454561
>killing animals is adharmi
Implying animals understand your dharma, animals can't reciprocate, so they are amoral. They don't get a seat at the moral table.
This isn't about being based or cool, it's just resource acquisition. Morality is for the in group, not your lunch.
+vSyhx
No.454613
>>454581
>Implying animals understand your dharma, animals can't reciprocate, so they are amoral. They don't get a seat at the moral table.
Your abrahamism shows, every hindu knows animals are dharmic. You cucks will never understand it
Rp69HX
No.454615
>>454581
causing unnessecary suffering is not dharma
dharma is righteous
You retards follow books written by people from past like they were ultra knowledgable chads
for those texts which actually do make sense like Bhagvad gita you morph and misinterpret it's meaning to suit your fancy
in conclusion
mujhe chappal forum mei bhais ke aage been bajane mei maza aata hai
GVqhhQ
No.454624
>>454579
lmfao what does any "scripture" (the mahabharata isn't scripture anyway but lets ignore that) have to do with the fact that it's wrong?
Killing/abusing/torturing animals if it's not necessary for survival is wrong.
There is nothing cultured, civilized or good about it - it's a bugman trait.
>>454581
Yes this is the typical abrahamic view of living beings - animals as objects created for humans to eat.
Either you are one already or you may as well convert.
lmNX5E
No.454656
>>454613
Sure carbslopper keep munching on your grains 
3aDHT0
No.454662
>>454624
Mughlai chicken stuffed is the best thing to eat yaar tu bhi khaaiyo
DmVJ9o
No.454671
>>454516
Muslims eat all meat except pig
ugjPM3
No.454717
create it, first worlders dont owe you their resources. try to loot them like they did.
