Recent Posts
Islamic History of India - Day #1
SAVARNA ID TAGGING
HkcZQY
No.8012
We must unironically tag all savarnas, kind of like (indian) certificate for us only, except it shouldn't be fakeable. Why? Jeets in western countries are for the most part from upper (indian), with lower (indian)s either being a tiny or significant enough minority. These UC western jeets could lobby on our behalves, but there has to be a way for (auto-excised)s, sudras and those savarnas with fake OBC certificate to not sneak in by larping as savarnas.
>jaenu
anyone can buy that fake and gay thread
>reciting vedas
anyone can do that as well given enough training.
chipping our bodies that can serve as a unique identifier is the only way for us savarnas to unite and identify ourselves, migrate en masse and have our own israel i.e aryavarta.
jirQOS
No.8018
>>8012(OP)
This will just make it easier for (auto-excised)s to loot us yaar
HkcZQY
No.8022
>>8018
yaar, we seriously need our own land asap and mix with each other rather than segregating ourselves again with (indian). All of us wear jaenu, all of us have high iq and all of us have sufficient steppe blood. Besides, a good lot of the army is controlled by us so I don't see why we shouldn't go ape against these sudras and (auto-excised)s and carve up our own aryavarta here as well with foreign funding, if our people abroad can't import us there.
8WHrJe
No.8025
>>8022
Leave them, even the UC elites in india don't care about you
You are on your own, there are few people who supports their (indian) selflessly but liberal/leftist UC rands destroy all their work
Best you can do is to start helping fellow UCs and stop giving employment to deletes and treat them like untouchables
8WHrJe
No.8029
>>8028
There are 100-120 million people who call themselves savarna
jirQOS
No.8030
>>8023
technically i am nri and i do care about my fellow UCs
jirQOS
No.8031
>>8026
source 4 chart?
8WHrJe
No.8032
>>8031
No source needed sir
Just compare EWS (The poor UCs) with any other category (Average delete/OBC)
HkcZQY
No.8033
>>8029
the west, including latin america, has more to gain than to lose importing the top 33% of savarnas if we're being honest.
>100-120 million
I think it's closer to 250-300 million people, which also means they're capable enough to launch an all out sudra-(auto-excised) cleaning campaign within lundia
8WHrJe
No.8035
>>8033
Pajeet jaake padhle
Ghar se bahar nikalte nahi hai or sapne dekho
We will end the BJP
We will form separate country
We will emigrate
UGC Rollback will be the biggest achievement for UCs
HkcZQY
No.8039
>>8035
nope. scraping the obc rejerbhation or ensuring every GC gets labelled as OBC will be the biggest win.
HkcZQY
No.8040
>>8037
how so is it fake?
mrHod4
No.8041
>>8040
some twitter (auto-excised) cooked it up. it's not a part of any real paper or study.
HkcZQY
No.8043
>>8041
or it could be from a set of collected data from various sources
mrHod4
No.8045
>>8042
so? i'm not a (auto-excised) (auto-excised), bhadwe. kek.
HkcZQY
No.8046
>>8041
just checked it and it's literally made using data from "The intelligence of nations"
mrHod4
No.8047
>>8043
nanhe pajeet, ja jaake padh le pehle how real IQ studies are conducted.
this chart is equivalent of me saying that you got ass-blasted by 70 guys last night and then creating a pie chart to show how many of those were (auto-excised)s versus how many of 'em were randuwes. kek.
HkcZQY
No.8048
>>8047
anything wrong with that book though?
mrHod4
No.8049
>>8046
here's that book:
https://www.academia.edu/120520931/The_Intelligence_of_Nations_National_IQs_and_Correlates
show me where the (indian)-data has been surrogated here? kek. muh me le le mera.
HkcZQY
No.8050
>>8049
I thought he book was by richard lynn and not this ronald henss rando
mrHod4
No.8051
rK2xOl
No.8052
HkcZQY
No.8054
mrHod4
No.8055
>>8053
shore. look through your 'sources'. lynn did a grand total of 1 (indian)-based IQ study in india and nepal iirc, and found that brahmins had a 4-5 IQ points difference vis-a-vis (auto-excised)s on-average.
this gemini slop is pure AI hallucination. either that, or you've fed it some garbage in the first place.
HkcZQY
No.8056
>>8055
nah, I just asked it to state the avg iq of india by various (indian)/varna groups according to lynn's findings
mrHod4
No.8057
>>8054
yes. this is the study i'm talking about. here lynn and cheng do a literature review. their final findings were as follows:
>(indian) differences in intelligence, education and earnings in India and Nepal are reviewed. The highest (indian), Brahmin, had higher intelligence estimated at 4.7 IQ points, as well as higher education and earnings when compared with the lowest (indian)s, known as (auto-excised)s, Sudas, or Scheduled (indian)s.
so, this graph that you've shared is objectively false.
HkcZQY
No.8059
>>8057
ain't verbal reasoning more g loaded though?
mrHod4
No.8071
>>8059
>ain't verbal reasoning more g loaded though?
gemini se poochh, kek.
yes. verbal reasoning is generally more g-loaded since it integrates working memory and inference BUT it is subject to language-exposure. out-groups talk in their own tongues so, they're generally disadvantaged in verbal reasoning sections. they have their own vernaculars.
