/b/ - Random

>>244818(OP)

Look at how the jeets charge at each other, the Gentlemen's slap battle

>>244829

qrd? looks like local college

>>244829

>>244829

Jeet literally pounced into battle only to have his balls smacked and spend the rest of the "fight" fumbling around like a todfler

India’s hot, humid climate historically punished prolonged physical exertion. In contrast, colder northern latitudes rewarded higher-intensity physical competition (think Viking raids, steppe warfare, jousts). Indians evolved in an environment where “saving energy” mattered more than going berserk in a brawl. Hence: less explosive aggression, more short bursts (slaps, grabs).

Also due to historically vegetarian-heavy diet, combined with centuries of agrarian subsistence, means less protein intake and lower testosterone profiles on average compared to beef-heavy warrior cultures (steppe nomads, Germanics). That shapes the “streetfight vibe”less knockout power, more grappling. For ~2,000 years, India had a rigid varna/jati system. Combat was professionalized into warrior castes (Kshatriyas, Rajputs, Marathas, Sikhs), while the majority of people weren’t selected for martial traits. Compare this to, say, Europe, where warfare mobilized entire populations more often. Streetfighting styles echo this evolutionary

>>244829

I remember this video was seen by lot of people on twitter before all the india hate. Many foreigners didn't understand that this is a fight between 2 college groups and started quoting, "wow indians are tough people. They are handling a gang war by first and might and not via a gun"; "I think indians are civil, even the gangs have uniform or a dress code which has to be followed"

If this trends today, it will trend for all the wrong reasons

>>244837

>indians are tough people

Kekda

Not even redditors are soy enough to consider this pathetic display of a brawl tough. You must have either read comments by super sheltered lgbtqs who have never even seen a fight or just a larping jeet

Indians value their ego and status more than health. Which is why slaps are used instead of punches. A slap may not hurt as much but it is much more humiliating.

>>244837

>I think indians are civil, even the gangs have uniform or a dress code which has to be followed

Kek yaar

>>244836

Kshatriyas ARE Rajputs. There is no other caste under Kshatriya

>inb4 jaat or khatri

literal shudras. Not even joking

>>244849

There are south indian kshatriyas who arent rajpoos

>>244849

Khatri word comes from chatri (Kshatriya) or no?

>>244852

Oh really? Like?

>>244849

Everyone who used to be ruler caste once is a kshatriya

>>244856

Rajus, vanniyars, thevars, nairs, and a lot more.

Marathas are also kshatriyas who dont identify as rajpot

>inb4 jaat or khatriliteral shudras. Not even joking

Barely matters, these “shudras” have had good martial experience. Even more than a few Rajput clans kek.

And good luck telling people in picrel that they are “shudras”.

>>244853

Kenneth W. Jones; Kenneth W.Jones (1976). Arya Dharm: Hindu Consciousness in 19th-century Punjab. University of California Press. pp. 4–5. ISBN 978-0-520-02920-0.

>Among Punjabi Hindus the Vaishyas would lead; among Vaishyas, the Khatri and his associates, the Saraswat Brahmins. The Khatris claimed with some justice and increasing insistence, the status of Rajputs, or Kshatriyas, a claim not granted by British but illustrative of their ambiguous position on the great varna scale of class divisions and their importance within the Hindu community. Processed of questionable and flexible status in the traditional hierarchy, literate, urban and often wealthy, in search of recognition for their achievements and pretentions, the Khatris acted as traditional innovators, leaders into new worlds

>>244858

Nope

>>244864

Yaar chamaar, I don't give a fuck about your looks. You can be literal Indian Robert Pattinson or Chico and that would still not change the fact that you are a shudra and a bhangi. Kys

>shudras” have had good martial experience. Even more than a few Rajput clans kek.

Post source or thari bhen mhari randi bhangijeet

>>244849

Not true, vedic kshatriyas don't exist anymore, rajputs are also sanskritized shudras .

>>244887

>t. leftoid dalit

As I said before, do you have a source? Yaar chamar

>>244893

Do you have a source on Rajputs being direct descendants of Vedic Kshatriyas?

>>244897

Yes.

https://ignca.gov.in/Asi_data/892.pdf (page 106, Rajput is synonymous with Kshatriya)

https://doi.org/10.25911/5d74e50054bb9

AGS has a pretty good analysis of it too here: https://agrippedsoul.wordpress.com/2020/02/21/rajaputrastoryevolution/

>>244903

the word Rajput is derived from rajaputra meaning prince and a lot of historical texts will use the word rajput to refer to prince thus causing this confusion i suppose, maybe this is also because of it.

>Picrel : James Tod - Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, v. 1 of 3 The Project Gutenberg eBook page no. - 36

>>244868

Chal na, you “khastriya” Rajputs were literal cucks. Sold your women to Mughals.

>>244929

If Rajputs were such cucks, why did you shudras abandon your entire history to try and LARP as us? Kek

>>244818(OP)

Itna acha post chl rha tha , chutiyo ne caste larp shuru krdia. Any solution to this op?

>>244837

Not sure where you saw tht. All I heard was why are they fighting like kids in comments.