/b/ - Random

Wignat stonetoss using muh caste system to justify anti india hatred

Should bharatchan do something about these guys

>>113752(OP)

He is already treated nazi by leftist. Also the above meme jas nothing wrong in it.

>>113752(OP)

just call them mlechha and move on

who cares?

>>113752(OP)

He is right. Just open any random thread on this board and observe the caste nignoggery.

>>113752(OP)

>>113764

topkek trvke

>>113752(OP)

white people won't exist in 60-70 years(karma)

look at the birth rate of Europe Australia use its below 1.5 and the one keeping this birthrate above 1 are immigrant.

Nothing can solve this birthrate problem literally

nothing , its in a free fall

china South Korea and japan too has a birthrate problem worse than Europe

so don't care about them

9/10 wignat accounts you see online are people of colours hahahah

>>113773

people who left are muslims, africans and indians

muslims will likely destroy each other

>>113773

>>113775

indian tfr is dropping too tho

>>113778

its drooping but above replacement level

interestingly in report published last month TFR increased in some North Indian states doing remember which ones

>>113781

Muslims

>>113786

your are right

I have question somewhat related to this

what do you think might be h population of UCs in india?

my estimates are

hindu UCs-- 150-200 mil

muslim UCs-- 40-50mil

>>113752(OP)

this is not 4chan or sharty my fren no ones autistic enough here to make the shatru kneel to their will (i would love to but I don't have that autism in me either)

>>113788

its at least 25% of total. population, so at least 350 million

>>113804

>muh tfr scare

It's good that tfr is down

>>113813

This is true. Lundia's UC have TFR rates comparable to Gookland. While being on average 100 times worse off than average gook. People really don't know how bad things will get.

>>113813

what could be the reason behind sudden drops in tfr in india? isn't that associated with later staces of capitalism

>>113813

>>113815

Tfr would fix themelsves when we grow up of this dystopian survival phase of country. And even if, even if, 1 billion people were taken out, india would still be 2nd most populated country.

>>113817

Retard tier question. All tfr problem is mehngai.

>>113819

india was poorer than this 60 years ago, people were popping out kids like crazy

>>113805

Tfr nose diving has never been good anywhere. Even Japan which is as overpopulated as a developed country can get(it's an Archipelago the size of Rajasthan having the population of Russia) faced trouble when their tfr reduced. You'll never know how bad it is unless you encounter actual empty villages and towns.

>>113821

Rajasthan has 7 crore people itself, and that is after a major chunk of state is inhabitable deserts

>>113818

Capitalism and industrialization primarily worked on the principle of division of labour. It's truly retard propoganda to think population size could ever be a net negative. India was much poorer when it's population was just quarter of what it was today.

>>113824

Not the point.

>>113819

No, the primary tfr collapser have been a) female workforce participation b) late marriages.

>>113820

Yeah. Thats the thing. When people get some money, they get educated live in more civilisedregion where everything is expensive and popping out more than 2 kids is looked down. But thats another case coz from region standards where everybody wants their kids to survive this hellhole they want them to study in peak school. They cannot afford 2.

>>113819

>>113828

It's not even muh education because there are countries which are highly educated like be Israel and Kazakhstan nevertheless have high tfr because they encourage their women to marry young and have kids young instead of careermaxxing in their 20s.

>>113829

>get the money

we barely are that rich though, this is not a valid reason for tfr drop imo

>>113829

Wrong

See >>113830

>>113830

exceptions..

>>113828

Memes made by incels who never actually saw a arent raising a kid in 21st century. Female workforce participation affects marriages before tfr. And in india its still not there to women having kids without marriages. Thats another case areasy because like 1 or 2 women per 100 will remain unmarried.

>>113831

>>113830

Yr pajeet its not actually rich. Its living standards. Most people in cannot afford 2 kids in prime schools. Simple as. Pooor peopl have more kidsbecause they are retarded and cannot understand economics.

>>113828

On point. education plays a role in this

>>113836

most people will not even send their kids to prime school yaar, we don't have that many as well, unless people just doom out because of this, this is again not a valid reason

>>113833

>Indian UC TFR is 1.8

That iirc is just all Hindus.

>>113834

Not really exceptions when the same culture everywhere yield the same results. This is noted in high tfr cultures within white white countries like Mormons who are also highly educated yet have tfr higher than average Indian because the women are encouraged to not work.

This is a meme that muh education is the reason why we're having reduced tfr. We are not even that rich to be having that lmao. Whites were much much more richer and educated than us now when they had tfr higher than us now.

>>113838

people are always tryimg the most expensive school they can afford for their kids. This is prime them. They know how expensive buying a home is, coaching is, a survivable lifestyle is in pajeetland and college fees and other prospects of raising kids.

>>113840

>whites were even more educated

Does it account for female literacy? I fear it probably doesn't

>>113841

No, this is just cope. No one is aiming to send their kids to top tier schools lol. We don't even have that many schools to begin with.

Tfr collapse in this country can be entirely explained by jeeceling, not this muh education cope. This is also the reason it collapsed in Gookland.

Not much time for romance when you're jeemaxxing in your teens and 20s and then career maxxing the rest of 20s.

By the time you get married in your 30s, window of fertility shifts and at most you can get 1 or 2 kids.

>but but they're slaving till 30s for their kids

Lol no. As far as I know, most of their wages earned till then goes for wedding lmao.

>>113841

School education is really basic and cheap unless you are after fancy schools. Also at the end of day schooling doesnt really matter. IQ is what determines a successful future.

Clothes

Can get second hand. One time investment and can be reused for the younger sibling.

>>113842

It does. In fact the highest teen pregnancy was reported in America during the 90s, and they achieved over 90% frm literacy in 1990

While India's is still less than 80.

>>113845

interesting, Although I don't encourage pre marital pregnancy, perhaps we can go have marriage just after passing from school for women and then after having 3-4 kids they can be acommodated in female specific jobs which are light and can also give an environment for kids to live in

>>113847

its not a big difference anyway

>>113845

and they are reaping that now, naturally any woman who gets educated till 17-18 would seek a college and then a job, where would marriage fit in here?

>>113843

>No one is aiming to send their kids to top tier schools

Read again

>trying the most expensive school they can afford for their kids

>they can afford for their kids.

Also, would be better if you literally asked the parents why they not having more kids instead of cooking theories and trying best to stray further from truth. The parents themselve know that cheap schools will literally ruin their kids lives.

>>>113844

>School education is really basic and cheap

Not everybody is making 24lpa. Look at the stats on how much avg indian is making and the cost of lands, house, coachin and schooling.

>>113847

Okay then, maybe I misremembered the Buddhist tfr as uc one.

>>113846

I don't think 90s US is an ideal case as it's mostly relaxed sexual norms causing lots of teen pregnancies.

Unlike say Kazakhstan where women attend college while pregnant or Israel where they get pregnant during army service and no one judges them badly for it because they don't really loose their 'career' building years.

>>113850

it does not cost that much unless you want to send them to the fanciest schools possible

>>113852

>>113850

>Not everybody is making 24lpa

>>113850

See >>113843

I already addressed the muh schooling argument here.

No, the biggest concern when putting off marriage isn't future kids education.

>>113853

and not everyone sends kids to such schools, more so we don't even have many such schools, maybe like 10 per tier 1 city, you can even join some high end schools in metropolitans for 60k- 1lakh

>>113855

per anum

>>113849

I think that's the mistake we teach to women. The best time to have kids is in your teens and 20s when you got no other responsibilities. Israeli women doing basically what counts as part time job in army for plenty of time to get pregnant because they don't have to think about work and sheit during compulsory army serving period.

>>113843

most people who don't get married by 30 dont even intend to get married in first place, they only do that due to societal pressure and create genetically weaker babies, such parents should be discouraged

>>113857

women can rarely even compete in higher studies, unless they are really outstanding, so much of their time is basically wasted in getting overqualified for a mid level job

>>113859

It's not just feminist propoganda saar. Iceland which is feminist as hell has tfr comparable to Hindus while Japan where leaders make sexist jokes on national tv has tfr comparable to Korea.

I think bigger factor is just how much free time a woman got in her hands kek. Jap women are working till failure while nordic women for plenty free time because of all the welfare state.

>>113860

>>113862

what are you even talking about even 20% is very high, other women are also hoarding for other mid level jobs, this eats up already crippling job infrastructure in India witj unproductive people

>infant mortality

what does that have to do with tfr? in a healthy society decrease infant mortality increases tfr

>>113863

>It's not just feminist propoganda saar. Iceland which is feminist as hell has tfr comparable to Hindus

That's nothing doe

>>113863

Another factor is that Iceland is a small island so not much else to do to entertain than to fuck lol. They literally made apps so that you don't accidentally fuck your cousin or half sister lol.

>>113865

Yeah but if it's tied to feminism, it should be proportional instead of being all over the place. Personally I think as I said age of marriage/first pregnancy > female workforce participation > child rearing support network (hence why nuclear families are inherently tied to lowering tfr because in most cases it's the woman doing all the work while in joint families the grandparents and the siblings also help raising kid).

>>113867

>Besides you can still develop relationships while jeecelling

You can't actually. That's why jeeceling is considered brootal. I mean think about it. Building relationships takes time and money, it's not happening when you spend most of it for jeeceling.

>>113867

>>113869

Especially not in a country like India or Gookland where traditionally women are walled off from men and you can't just 'ask out' some random woman to be your gf and need to build familiarity first before even thinking about asking out.